Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32667444›Full record

GuidelineRevista Brasileira de terapia intensiva2020

Guidelines for the pharmacological treatment of COVID-19. The task-force/consensus guideline of the Brazilian Association of Intensive Care Medicine, the Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases and the Brazilian Society of Pulmonology and Tisiology.

Maicon Falavigna, Verônica Colpani, Cinara Stein, Luciano Cesar Pontes Azevedo, Angela Maria Bagattini, Gabriela Vilela de Brito, José Miguel Chatkin, Sergio Cimerman, Mirian de Freitas Dal Ben Corradi, Clovis Arns da Cunha and 17 more

Open access · diamondAbstract readConsensus StatementPractice Guideline
In one paragraph

Guideline in Revista Brasileira de terapia intensiva, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 120 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Guideline
  6. Guideline
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. An overview on the current available treatment for COVID-19 and the impact of antibiotic administration during the pandemic.Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologica · 2021
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

27 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Maicon FalavignaHospital Moinhos de Vento, Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil.
Verônica ColpaniHospital Moinhos de Vento, Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil.
Cinara SteinHospital Moinhos de Vento, Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil.
Luciano Cesar Pontes AzevedoHospital Sírio-Libanês - São Paulo (SP), Brasil.
Angela Maria BagattiniHospital Sírio-Libanês - São Paulo (SP), Brasil.
Gabriela Vilela de BritoCentro Internacional de Pesquisa, Hospital Alemão Oswaldo Cruz - São Paulo (SP), Brasil.
José Miguel ChatkinPontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul - Porto Alegre (RS), Brasil.
Sergio CimermanInstituto de Infectologia Emílio Ribas - São Paulo (SP), Brasil.
Mirian de Freitas Dal Ben CorradiHospital Sírio-Libanês - São Paulo (SP), Brasil.
Clovis Arns da CunhaSociedade Brasileira de Infectologia - São Paulo (SP), Brasil.
Flávia Cordeiro de MedeirosCentro Internacional de Pesquisa, Hospital Alemão Oswaldo Cruz - São Paulo (SP), Brasil.
Haliton Alves de Oliveira JuniorCentro Internacional de Pesquisa, Hospital Alemão Oswaldo Cruz - São Paulo (SP), Brasil.
Leandro Genehr FritscherHospital Moinhos de Vento, Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil.
Marcelo Basso GazzanaPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Pneumológicas, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul - Porto Alegre (RS), Brasil.
Débora Dalmas GräfHospital Moinhos de Vento, Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil.
Lays Pires MarraCentro Internacional de Pesquisa, Hospital Alemão Oswaldo Cruz - São Paulo (SP), Brasil.
Jessica Yumi MatuokaPontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul - Porto Alegre (RS), Brasil.
Michelle Silva NunesEmpresa Brasileira de Serviços Hospitalares - Brasília (DF), Brasil.
Daniela Vianna PachitoHospital Sírio-Libanês - São Paulo (SP), Brasil.
Cássia Garcia Moraes PaganoHospital Moinhos de Vento, Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil.
Patrícia do Carmo Silva ParreiraCentro Internacional de Pesquisa, Hospital Alemão Oswaldo Cruz - São Paulo (SP), Brasil.
Rachel RieraHospital Sírio-Libanês - São Paulo (SP), Brasil.
Amilton SilvaHospital Alemão Oswaldo Cruz - São Paulo (SP), Brasil.
Bruno de Melo TavaresHospital Alemão Oswaldo Cruz - São Paulo (SP), Brasil.
Alexandre Prehn ZavasckiServiço de Infectologia e Controle de Infecção, Hospital Moinhos de Vento - Porto Alegre (RS), Brasil.
Regis Goulart RosaHospital Moinhos de Vento, Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil.
Felipe Dal-PizzolLaboratório de Fisiopatologia Experimental, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências da Saúde, Universidade do Extremo Sul Catarinense – Criciúma (SC), Brasil.
Hospital Moinhos de Vento · BRAssociação de Medicina Intensiva Brasileira · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDifferent therapies are currently used, considered, or proposed for the treatment of COVID-19; for many of those therapies, no appropriate assessment of effectiveness and safety was performed. This document aims to provide scientifically available evidence-based information in a transparent interpretation, to subsidize decisions related to the pharmacological therapy of COVID-19 in Brazil.

methodsA group of 27 experts and methodologists integrated a task-force formed by professionals from the Brazilian Association of Intensive Care Medicine (Associação de Medicina Intensiva Brasileira - AMIB), the Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases (Sociedad Brasileira de Infectologia - SBI) and the Brazilian Society of Pulmonology and Tisiology (Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisiologia - SBPT). Rapid systematic reviews, updated on April 28, 2020, were conducted. The assessment of the quality of evidence and the development of recommendations followed the GRADE system. The recommendations were written on May 5, 8, and 13, 2020.

resultsEleven recommendations were issued based on low or very-low level evidence. We do not recommend the routine use of hydroxychloroquine, chloroquine, azithromycin, lopinavir/ritonavir, corticosteroids, or tocilizumab for the treatment of COVID-19. Prophylactic heparin should be used in hospitalized patients, however, no anticoagulation should be provided for patients without a specific clinical indication. Antibiotics and oseltamivir should only be considered for patients with suspected bacterial or influenza coinfection, respectively.

conclusionSo far no pharmacological intervention was proven effective and safe to warrant its use in the routine treatment of COVID-19 patients; therefore such patients should ideally be treated in the context of clinical trials. The recommendations herein provided will be revised continuously aiming to capture newly generated evidence.

Indexed as

Coronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19HumansPandemicsPneumonia, Viral

Identifiers

PMID32667444
PMCPMC7405746
OpenAlexW3041127941

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.