Time to positivity: a useful parameter to evaluate intensive care unit blood stream infections?

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Comparative analysis of the detection capabilities of BacT/ALERT and BACTEC blood culture systems for simulated and clinical bacteremia specimens.Scientific reports · 2026
   Article
2. Short turnaround time of seven to nine hours from sample collection until informed decision for sepsis treatment using nanopore sequencing.Scientific reports · 2024
   Article
3. The Epidemiological, Clinical, and Microbiological Features of Patients withTropical medicine and infectious disease · 2023
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as