Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32667033›Full record

ArticleBioscience reports2020

Bioinformatics analysis of potential core genes for glioblastoma.

Yu Zhang, Xin Yang, Xiao-Lin Zhu, Jia-Qi Hao, Hao Bai, You-Chao Xiao, Zhuang-Zhuang Wang, Chun-Yan Hao, Hu-Bin Duan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioscience reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Coexistence of a novelFrontiers in oncology · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Identification ofCancer genomics & proteomics
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Yu ZhangDepartment of Neurosurgery, First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, 85 Jiefang South Road,Taiyuan, Shanxi 030001, P. R. China.
Xin YangDepartment of Neurosurgery, First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, 85 Jiefang South Road,Taiyuan, Shanxi 030001, P. R. China.
Xiao-Lin ZhuDepartment of Neurosurgery, First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, 85 Jiefang South Road,Taiyuan, Shanxi 030001, P. R. China.
Jia-Qi HaoDepartment of Neurosurgery, First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, 85 Jiefang South Road,Taiyuan, Shanxi 030001, P. R. China.
Hao BaiDepartment of Neurosurgery, First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, 85 Jiefang South Road,Taiyuan, Shanxi 030001, P. R. China.
You-Chao XiaoDepartment of Neurosurgery, First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, 85 Jiefang South Road,Taiyuan, Shanxi 030001, P. R. China.
Zhuang-Zhuang WangDepartment of Neurosurgery, First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, 85 Jiefang South Road,Taiyuan, Shanxi 030001, P. R. China.
Chun-Yan HaoDepartment of Geriatrics, First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, 85 Jiefang South Road,Taiyuan, Shanxi 030001, P. R. China.
Hu-Bin DuanDepartment of Neurosurgery, First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, 85 Jiefang South Road,Taiyuan, Shanxi 030001, P. R. China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGlioblastoma (GBM) has a high degree of malignancy, aggressiveness and recurrence rate. However, there are limited options available for the treatment of GBM, and they often result in poor prognosis and unsatisfactory outcomes. MATERIALS AND

methodsIn order to identify potential core genes in GBM that may provide new therapeutic insights, we analyzed three gene chips (GSE2223, GSE4290 and GSE50161) screened from the GEO database. Differentially expressed genes (DEG) from the tissues of GBM and normal brain were screened using GEO2R. To determine the functional annotation and pathway of DEG, Gene Ontology (GO) and KEGG pathway enrichment analysis were conducted using DAVID database. Protein interactions of DEG were visualized using PPI network on Cytoscape software. Next, 10 Hub nodes were screened from the differentially expressed network using MCC algorithm on CytoHubba software and subsequently identified as Hub genes. Finally, the relationship between Hub genes and the prognosis of GBM patients was described using GEPIA2 survival analysis web tool.

resultsA total of 37 up-regulated and 187 down-regulated genes were identified through microarray analysis. Amongst the 10 Hub genes selected, SV2B appeared to be the only gene associated with poor prognosis in glioblastoma based on the survival analysis.

conclusionOur study suggests that high expression of SV2B is associated with poor prognosis in GBM patients. Whether SV2B can be used as a new therapeutic target for GBM requires further validation.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorBrainBrain NeoplasmsComputational BiologyDatasets as TopicDown-RegulationGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGene Regulatory NetworksGlioblastomaHumansMembrane GlycoproteinsNerve Tissue ProteinsOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisPrognosisProtein Interaction MappingBiomarkers, TumorMembrane GlycoproteinsNerve Tissue ProteinsSV2B protein, humanDEGglioblastomaHub genesSV2B

Identifiers

PMID32667033
PMCPMC7385582

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.