ArticleZhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery2020
[Percutaneous endoscopic Key-Hole technology for treatment of paracentral cervical disc herniation].
Article in Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Recent progress in surgical treatment of cervical spine myelopathy - A narrative review.Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma · 2025Article
- [Efficacy of the far lateral Key-hole technique in the treatment of central cervical disc herniation].Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2025Article
- Review
- Short-term clinical outcomes and technical advantages of mini-open endoscope assisted anterior cervical discectomy and fusion in the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2025Article
- Optimal approach for total endoscopic discectomy and its effect on lumbar and leg function in patients with disc herniation.World journal of clinical cases · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo investigate the effectiveness of percutaneous endoscopic posterior cervical Key-Hole fenestration decompression and nucleus pulposus extirpation in the treatment of paracentral cervical disc herniation.
methodsBetween December 2015 and October 2018, 29 cases of paracentral cervical disc herniation were treated with percutaneous endoscopic posterior cervical Key-Hole fenestration decompression and nucleus pulposus extirpation. There were 16 males and 13 females, with an average age of 49.7 years (range, 39-78 years). The disease duration was 3.5-15.0 months (mean, 6.2 months). The herniated disc located at C
resultsAll patients were followed up 11-43 months, with an average of 19.4 months. The operation time was 67-89 minutes (mean, 73.3 minutes); the intraoperative blood loss was 18-30 mL (mean, 22.9 mL); the hospital stay was 5-10 days (mean, 7.3 days). All the incisions healed by first intention. There was 1 case of hypodynia and hyperalgesia in the affected limb after operation,1 case of decreased limb muscle strength. The VAS scores and JOA scores at each time point after operation were superior to those before operation (
conclusionFor the paracentral cervical disc herniation with simultaneous compression of nerve roots and spinal cord, percutaneous endoscopic posterior cervical Key-Hole fenestration decompression and nucleus pulposus extirpation has the advantages of small trauma, quick recovery, and satisfactory effectiveness, and can be used as a safe and effective minimally invasive procedure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.