Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32666673›Full record

ArticleCancer medicine2020

Dual MGMT inactivation by promoter hypermethylation and loss of the long arm of chromosome 10 in glioblastoma.

Sophie Richard, Gaëlle Tachon, Serge Milin, Michel Wager, Lucie Karayan-Tapon

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. A Synopsis of Biomarkers in Glioblastoma: Past and Present.Current issues in molecular biology · 2024
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Molecular and Circulating Biomarkers in Patients with Glioblastoma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  10. Prognostic and Predictive Biomarkers in Gliomas.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sophie RichardFaculté de Médecine, Université de Poitiers, Poitiers, France.
Gaëlle TachonFaculté de Médecine, Université de Poitiers, Poitiers, France.ORCID 0000-0002-0391-7143
Serge MilinLaboratoire d'anatomopathologie, CHU de Poitiers, Poitiers, France.
Michel WagerLaboratoire de cancérologie biologique, CHU de Poitiers, Poitiers, France.
Lucie Karayan-TaponFaculté de Médecine, Université de Poitiers, Poitiers, France.
Inserm · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Poitiers · FRUniversité de Poitiers · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEpigenetic inactivation of O6-methylguanine-methyltransferase (MGMT) gene by methylation of its promoter is predictive of Temozolomid (TMZ) response in glioblastoma (GBM). MGMT is located on chromosome 10q26 and the loss of chromosome 10q is observed in 70% of GBMs. In this study, we assessed the hypothesis that the dual inactivation of MGMT, by hypermethylation of MGMT promoter and by loss the long arm of chromosome 10 (10q), may confer greater sensitivity to TMZ.

methodsA total of 149 tumor samples from patients diagnosed with GBM based on the WHO 2016 classification were included in this retrospective study between November 2016 and December 2018. Methylation status of MGMT promoter was evaluated by pyrosequencing and status of chromosome 10q was assessed by array comparative genomic hybridization.

resultsGlioblastoma patients with chromosome 10q loss associated with hypermethylation of MGMT promoter had significantly longer overall survival (OS) (P = .0024) and progression-free survival (PFS) (P = .031). Indeed, median OS of patients with dual inactivation of MGMT was 21.5 months compared to 12 months and 8.1 months for groups with single MGMT inactivation by hypermethylation and by 10q loss, respectively. The group with no MGMT inactivation had 9.5 months OS. Moreover, all long-term survivors with persistent response to TMZ treatment (OS ≥ 30 months) displayed dual inactivation of MGMT.

conclusionsOur data suggest that the molecular subgroup characterized by the dual inactivation of MGMT receives greater benefit from TMZ treatment. The results of our study may be of immediate clinical interest since chromosome 10q status and methylation of MGMT promoter are commonly determined in routine practice.

Indexed as

Chromosome DeletionAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnalysis of VarianceAntineoplastic Agents, AlkylatingCentral Nervous System NeoplasmsChromosomes, Human, Pair 10Comparative Genomic HybridizationCpG IslandsDNA MethylationDNA Modification MethylasesDNA Repair EnzymesFemaleGene SilencingAntineoplastic Agents, AlkylatingDNA Modification MethylasesDNA Repair EnzymesMGMT protein, humanTemozolomideTumor Suppressor Proteins10qcomparative genomic hybridizationglioblastomaloss of heterozygosityMGMT

Identifiers

PMID32666673
PMCPMC7476845
OpenAlexW3042348299

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.