ArticleJournal of thrombosis and thrombolysis2021
Effect of a novel pharmacist-led reporting system on appropriate use of direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in a patient-centered medical home.
Article in Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- AIHEMAF-P: An Innovative Healthcare Model for Atrial Fibrillation Patients.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Anticoagulation stewardship: Descriptive analysis of a novel approach to appropriate anticoagulant prescription.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent analyses demonstrate roughly 16-24% of patients taking direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are prescribed an inappropriate dose, exposing patients to increased risk of thrombosis or bleeding. The use of reporting systems in the outpatient setting can efficiently identify potential medication errors and safety concerns. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of a novel pharmacist-driven reporting system on appropriate prescribing of DOACs in the outpatient setting. This single-center qualitative study was conducted within a patient-centered medical home (PCMH). Reports were generated monthly to include all new DOAC prescriptions. Branching logic and filters were utilized within a secure web application to make the reporting process more efficient and identify regimens needing an intervention. Pharmacists reviewed the regimens populated by filters and made recommendations to prescribers as appropriate. The number of interventions proposed was captured as the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes include the nature of drug therapy problems identified and number of interventions accepted by prescribers. A total of 107 patients were analyzed for appropriateness from November 2017 to February 2019. Of the regimens included for review, 15 regimens were identified as potentially inappropriate. The nature of drug therapy problems identified include under dosing (4.25%), overdosing (2.13%), correction of documentation (2.13%), clarification of indication (3.19%), and ordering laboratory studies (3.19%). Of the interventions recommended, fourteen (93%) were accepted. Pharmacists integrated in a PCMH are well positioned to monitor and resolve DOAC drug therapy problems using local clinical reports.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.