ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering2020
The Characteristic Recovery Time as a Novel, Noninvasive Metric for Assessing In Vivo Cartilage Mechanical Function.
Article in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.
- Analysis of cartilage creep-recovery of human osteoarthritic cartilage.European journal of medical research · 2026Article
- A framework to assess mechano-tribological, structural and biochemical properties of articular cartilage.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Assessment of morphology, radiopacity gradient and mechanical properties of articular cartilage with contrast-enhanced high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Exercise-Induced Changes in Knee Cartilage In Vivo: Comparing MRI Sequences.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2025Article
- Associations among ankle cartilage composition and ultrasound based measures of cartilage health in those with chronic ankle instability.Clinical rheumatology · 2025Article
- Resting Supine for 45 Minutes Yields Consistent Baseline Lumbar Intervertebral Disc Height in Asymptomatic Participants.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2025Article
- MRI-derived articular cartilage strains predict patient-reported outcomes six months post anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- From Tissue to System: What Constitutes an Appropriate Response to Loading?Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2025Review
- Morphologic Response in Femoral Cartilage During and After 40-Minute Treadmill Running.Journal of athletic training · 2024Article
- Automated magnetic resonance imaging-based grading of the lumbar intervertebral disc and facet joints.JOR spine · 2024Article
- T1ρ relaxation mapping in osteochondral lesions of the talus: a non-invasive biomarker for altered biomechanical properties of hyaline cartilage?European radiology experimental · 2024Article
- Brushing Up on Cartilage Lubrication: Polyelectrolyte-Enhanced Tribological Rehydration.Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids · 2024Article
- Influence of running on femoroacetabular joint bone-to-bone distances.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2024Article
- Effect of functional knee loading on articular cartilage MRI T2 relaxation time and thickness in patients at risk for knee osteoarthritis.Osteoarthritis imaging · 2024Article
- Acute responses and recovery in the femoral cartilage morphology following running and cool-down protocols.PeerJ · 2024Article
- MRI-based degeneration grades for lumbar facet joints do not correlate with cartilage mechanics.JOR spine · 2023Article
- Auto-segmentation of the tibia and femur from knee MR images via deep learning and its application to cartilage strain and recovery.Journal of biomechanics · 2023Article
- In vivo intervertebral disc mechanical deformation following a treadmill walking "stress test" is inversely related to T1rho relaxation time.Osteoarthritis and cartilage · 2023Article
- Obesity impacts the mechanical response and biochemical composition of patellofemoral cartilage: An in vivo, MRI-based investigation.Journal of biomechanics · 2022Article
- Engineering Aspects of Incidence, Prevalence, and Management of Osteoarthritis: A Review.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Osteoarthritis (OA) is a disease characterized by the degeneration of cartilage tissue, and is a leading cause of disability in the United States. The clinical diagnosis of OA includes the presence of pain and radiographic imaging findings, which typically do not present until advanced stages of the disease when treatment is difficult. Therefore, identifying new methods of OA detection that are sensitive to earlier pathological changes in cartilage, which may be addressed prior to the development of irreversible OA, is critical for improving OA treatment. A potentially promising avenue for developing early detection methods involves measuring the tissue's in vivo mechanical response to loading, as changes in mechanical function are commonly observed in ex vivo studies of early OA. However, thus far the mechanical function of cartilage has not been widely assessed in vivo. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to develop a novel methodology that can be used to measure an in vivo mechanical property of cartilage: the characteristic recovery time. Specifically, in this study we quantified the characteristic recovery time of cartilage thickness after exercise in relatively young subjects with asymptomatic cartilage. Additionally, we measured baseline cartilage thickness and T1rho and T2 relaxation times (quantitative MRI) prior to exercise in these subjects to assess whether baseline MRI measures are predictive of the characteristic recovery time, to understand whether or not the characteristic recovery time provides independent information about cartilage's mechanical state. Our results show that the mean recovery strain response across subjects was well-characterized by an exponential approach with a characteristic time of 25.2 min, similar to literature values of human characteristic times measured ex vivo. Further, we were unable to detect a statistically significant linear relationship between the characteristic recovery time and the baseline metrics measured here (T1rho relaxation time, T2 relaxation time, and cartilage thickness). This might suggest that the characteristic recovery time has the potential to provide additional information about the mechanical state of cartilage not captured by these baseline MRI metrics. Importantly, this study presents a noninvasive methodology for quantifying the characteristic recovery time, an in vivo mechanical property of cartilage. As mechanical response may be indicative of cartilage health, this study underscores the need for future studies investigating the characteristic recovery time and in vivo cartilage mechanical response at various stages of OA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.