Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32666421›Full record

ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering2020

The Characteristic Recovery Time as a Novel, Noninvasive Metric for Assessing In Vivo Cartilage Mechanical Function.

Hattie C Cutcliffe, Keithara M Davis, Charles E Spritzer, Louis DeFrate

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Exercise-Induced Changes in Knee Cartilage In Vivo: Comparing MRI Sequences.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Brushing Up on Cartilage Lubrication: Polyelectrolyte-Enhanced Tribological Rehydration.Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids · 2024
    Article
  13. Influence of running on femoroacetabular joint bone-to-bone distances.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hattie C CutcliffeDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
Keithara M DavisDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
Charles E SpritzerDepartment of Radiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
Louis DeFrateDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA. lou.defrate@duke.edu.
Duke University · US

Funding

In Vivo Knee Motion and ACL Biomechanics During Dynamic ActivitiesR01AR065527 · NIAMS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI DEFRATE, LOUIS E. · 2014 to 2024
$4.8M
Mechanical Biomarkers of Chronic Low Back PainR01AR075399 · NIAMS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI Louis E. DeFrate, Adam Goode · 2019 to 2026
$3.7M
Weight loss, in vivo cartilage mechanics, and joint healthR01AR074800 · NIAMS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI DEFRATE, LOUIS E. · 2019 to 2023
$1.8M
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR065527NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR074800NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR075399NIH HHS AR065527NIH HHS AR074800NIH HHS AR075399
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a disease characterized by the degeneration of cartilage tissue, and is a leading cause of disability in the United States. The clinical diagnosis of OA includes the presence of pain and radiographic imaging findings, which typically do not present until advanced stages of the disease when treatment is difficult. Therefore, identifying new methods of OA detection that are sensitive to earlier pathological changes in cartilage, which may be addressed prior to the development of irreversible OA, is critical for improving OA treatment. A potentially promising avenue for developing early detection methods involves measuring the tissue's in vivo mechanical response to loading, as changes in mechanical function are commonly observed in ex vivo studies of early OA. However, thus far the mechanical function of cartilage has not been widely assessed in vivo. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to develop a novel methodology that can be used to measure an in vivo mechanical property of cartilage: the characteristic recovery time. Specifically, in this study we quantified the characteristic recovery time of cartilage thickness after exercise in relatively young subjects with asymptomatic cartilage. Additionally, we measured baseline cartilage thickness and T1rho and T2 relaxation times (quantitative MRI) prior to exercise in these subjects to assess whether baseline MRI measures are predictive of the characteristic recovery time, to understand whether or not the characteristic recovery time provides independent information about cartilage's mechanical state. Our results show that the mean recovery strain response across subjects was well-characterized by an exponential approach with a characteristic time of 25.2 min, similar to literature values of human characteristic times measured ex vivo. Further, we were unable to detect a statistically significant linear relationship between the characteristic recovery time and the baseline metrics measured here (T1rho relaxation time, T2 relaxation time, and cartilage thickness). This might suggest that the characteristic recovery time has the potential to provide additional information about the mechanical state of cartilage not captured by these baseline MRI metrics. Importantly, this study presents a noninvasive methodology for quantifying the characteristic recovery time, an in vivo mechanical property of cartilage. As mechanical response may be indicative of cartilage health, this study underscores the need for future studies investigating the characteristic recovery time and in vivo cartilage mechanical response at various stages of OA.

Indexed as

Recovery of FunctionAdultCartilage, ArticularExerciseFemaleHumansKnee JointMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleOsteoarthritis, KneeYoung AdultCartilageMagnetic resonance imaging (MRI)Osteoarthritis (OA)Quantitative MRI (qMRI)RecoveryT1rho mappingT2 mapping

Identifiers

PMID32666421
PMCPMC7723945
OpenAlexW3042588820

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.