Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32666388›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of clinical oncology2020

Neo-adjuvant chemotherapy alone for the locally advanced rectal cancer: a systematic review.

Dimitrios K Manatakis, Nikolaos Gouvas, John Souglakos, Evangelos Xynos

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of clinical oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Organ Preservation in MSS Rectal Cancer.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Dimitrios K ManatakisDepartment of Surgery, Athens Naval and Veterans Hospital, Athens, Greece. medp2011862@med.uoc.gr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1263-8488
Nikolaos GouvasDepartment of Surgery, Medical School, University of Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus.
John SouglakosDepartment of Medical Oncology, Medical School, University of Crete, Heraklion, Greece.
Evangelos XynosDepartment of Surgery, Creta Interclinic Hospital, Heraklion, Greece.
Athens Naval & Veterans Hospital · GRPolyclinic General Hospital · GRUniversity of Crete · GRUniversity of Cyprus · CY

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neo-adjuvant chemoradiation (NA-CRT) is the standard of management for the locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC), achieving very low rates of local recurrence (LR). However, NA-CRT fails to control distant recurrence and improve survival, whilst it is associated with increased postoperative morbidity and increased acute and late toxicity. In recent years, neo-adjuvant chemotherapy (NACTx) appears in the literature as an alternative to NA-CRT in patients with LARC. In the present study, the authors review all current evidence on the specific subject. Following a systematic search of the literature, 25 studies were identified reporting on short- or long-term outcomes of NACTx for LARC. Seventeen studies were prospective or retrospective series, and 8 comparative. Of the comparative studies, one was a randomized control trial (RCT) comparing NACTx to NA-CRT and to the combination of NACTx/NA-CRT, and another a non-randomized study comparing NACTx to NA-CRT. Chemotherapeutic regimens were 5-fluoropyrimidine and oxaliplatin based. In some of them, irinotecan or/and bevacizumab was added. A pooled analysis showed that NACTx is associated with a mean anastomotic leak rate of 6.8%. In the RCT, postoperative morbidity and overall toxicity was significantly less in the NACTx group. Mean T downstaging (ypStage 0-I) was 49.6%, mean N downstaging 69.6% and mean pathologic complete response (pCR) 10.7%. The RCT showed an inferior pCR rate after NACTx than after NA-CRT, but similar rates of T downstaging. Mean LR was 8.6% and mean distant recurrence 17.2%. Satisfactory survival rates are reported by several studies. NACTx seems to be an alternative to NA-CRT for patients with LARC, associated with low anastomotic leak, adequate tumour downstaging, low LR and rather high survival rates. Further data deriving from high-quality studies are necessary to assess safety and efficacy of NACTx as a substitute to NA-CRT, for at least a subset of patients with LARC.

Indexed as

AgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBevacizumabFemaleHumansIrinotecanMaleMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant TherapyNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalOxaliplatinPostoperative ComplicationsProspective StudiesRectal NeoplasmsRectumRetrospective StudiesBevacizumabIrinotecanOxaliplatinLocally advancedLocal recurrenceNeo-adjuvant chemotherapyRectal cancer

Identifiers

PMID32666388
OpenAlexW3042889247

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.