Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32666387›Full record

ReviewAnnals of dyslexia2020

Capitalizing on the promise of item-level analyses to inform new understandings of word reading development.

Laura M Steacy

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of dyslexia, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Modeling Item-Level Spelling Variance in Adults: Providing Further Insights into Lexical Quality.Scientific studies of reading : the official journal of the Society for the Scientific Study of Reading · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Laura M SteacyFlorida Center for Reading Research, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, USA. lsteacy@fcrr.org.

Funding

Experiential and child factors that determine acquisition of orthographic-phonological regularities in a quasi-regular writing system: An integrated behavioral/computational/neurobiological approachP20HD091013 · NICHD · FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI COMPTON, DONALD L · 2017 to 2025
$4.2M
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development P20HD091013Institute of Education Sciences R324B190025NICHD NIH HHS P20 HD091013
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This special issue was expressly designed to illustrate how item-level analytic models can be employed to answer new questions in the field of reading. To accomplish this, we present a compilation of six empirical studies that explore how item-level analyses can be used to advance the field's understanding of word reading development. In this introduction to the special issue, I summarize the unique advantages of item-level analyses and discuss how the papers in this special issue are valuable examples of how item-focused analyses can be used in a variety of ways to address important questions across orthographies, word characteristics, and tasks.

Indexed as

ReadingChildChild DevelopmentChild, PreschoolComprehensionHumansSoftwareExplanatory item response modelsItem-level analysesWord reading development

Identifiers

PMID32666387
PMCPMC8168295

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.