Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32666333›Full record

Trial reportQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2020

Six and eight weeks injection frequencies of bevacizumab are non-inferior to the current four weeks injection frequency for quality of life in neovascular age-related macular degeneration: a randomized controlled trial.

Martijn S Visser, Sankha Amarakoon, Tom Missotten, Reinier Timman, Jan J V Busschbach

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialEquivalence Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Martijn S VisserDepartment of Psychiatry, Section Medical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Erasmus Medical Center, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. m.s.visser@erasmusmc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7022-7874
Sankha AmarakoonRotterdam Ophthalmic Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Tom MissottenRotterdam Ophthalmic Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Reinier TimmanDepartment of Psychiatry, Section Medical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Erasmus Medical Center, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Jan J V BusschbachDepartment of Psychiatry, Section Medical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Erasmus Medical Center, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Erasmus MC · NLCombined Ophthalmic Research Rotterdam · NL

Funding

CZ foundation AFVV09-168the Foundation for scientific research of the Rotterdam Eye Hospital SWOO-Flieringathe Theia foundation 2010157
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePatients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nARMD) will not deteriorate on visual acuity and retinal thickness when treated with bevacizumab injection frequencies of 6 or 8 weeks compared to 4 weeks. This study aimed to investigate this non-inferiority in quality of life (QoL). We hypothesized that less frequent bevacizumab injections are not inferior regarding patients reported QoL.

methodsPatients were randomized to bevacizumab every 4 (n = 64), 6 (n = 63), and 8 weeks (n = 64). Patients were at least 65 years old, have a best-corrected visual acuity of 20/200 to 20/20, no previous ARMD treatment and active leakage. Vision-related QoL questionnaire NEI VFQ-39 was used to assess QoL at baseline and after 1 year. General QoL questionnaire SF-36 was included for secondary analysis. Multilevel analyses were performed, correcting for age, gender and baseline.

resultsThe 6 (3.68; 95% CI - 0.63 to 8.00) and 8 (2.15; 95% CI - 2.26 to 6.56) weeks bevacizumab regimens resulted in non-inferior QoL differences compared to 4 weeks on the NEI VFQ-39. Also on the SF-36 the differences were well within the non-inferiority limits.

conclusionNon-inferiority of the 6 and 8 weeks frequencies was demonstrated compared to 4 weeks on vision-related and general QoL in patients with nARMD. These results are in line with previously published results of lower frequency injections regarding visual acuity and central retinal thickness. Lower injection frequency may reduce burden, side effects, and treatment costs. In consideration of these results, 8 weeks frequency injections of intravitreal bevacizumab could be considered in patients with nARMD.

Indexed as

AgedAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalBevacizumabFemaleHumansIntravitreal InjectionsMacular DegenerationMaleQuality of LifeTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalBevacizumabAge-related macular degenerationBevacizumabInjection frequencyNEI VFQ-39Quality of life

Identifiers

PMID32666333
PMCPMC7686180
OpenAlexW3042473063

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.