Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32666134›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurology2020

VOLT: a novel open-source pipeline for automatic segmentation of endolymphatic space in inner ear MRI.

J Gerb, S A Ahmadi, E Kierig, B Ertl-Wagner, M Dieterich, V Kirsch

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Imaging endolymphatic space of the inner ear in vestibular migraine.Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

J GerbDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
S A AhmadiDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
E KierigDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
B Ertl-WagnerDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany.
M DieterichDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
V KirschDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany. valerie.kirsch@med.lmu.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9397-436X
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DELMU Klinikum · DEMunich Cluster for Systems Neurology · DEUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung Grant code 01EO0901
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundObjective and volumetric quantification is a necessary step in the assessment and comparison of endolymphatic hydrops (ELH) results. Here, we introduce a novel tool for automatic volumetric segmentation of the endolymphatic space (ELS) for ELH detection in delayed intravenous gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of inner ear (iMRI) data.

methodsThe core component is a novel algorithm based on Volumetric Local Thresholding (VOLT). The study included three different data sets: a real-world data set (D1) to develop the novel ELH detection algorithm and two validating data sets, one artificial (D2) and one entirely unseen prospective real-world data set (D3). D1 included 210 inner ears of 105 patients (50 male; mean age 50.4 ± 17.1 years), and D3 included 20 inner ears of 10 patients (5 male; mean age 46.8 ± 14.4 years) with episodic vertigo attacks of different etiology. D1 and D3 did not differ significantly concerning age, gender, the grade of ELH, or data quality. As an artificial data set, D2 provided a known ground truth and consisted of an 8-bit cuboid volume using the same voxel-size and grid as real-world data with different sized cylindrical and cuboid-shaped cutouts (signal) whose grayscale values matched the real-world data set D1 (mean 68.7 ± 7.8; range 48.9-92.8). The evaluation included segmentation accuracy using the Sørensen-Dice overlap coefficient and segmentation precision by comparing the volume of the ELS.

resultsVOLT resulted in a high level of performance and accuracy in comparison with the respective gold standard. In the case of the artificial data set, VOLT outperformed the gold standard in higher noise levels. Data processing steps are fully automated and run without further user input in less than 60 s. ELS volume measured by automatic segmentation correlated significantly with the clinical grading of the ELS (p < 0.01).

conclusionVOLT enables an open-source reproducible, reliable, and automatic volumetric quantification of the inner ears' fluid space using MR volumetric assessment of endolymphatic hydrops. This tool constitutes an important step towards comparable and systematic big data analyses of the ELS in patients with the frequent syndrome of episodic vertigo attacks. A generic version of our three-dimensional thresholding algorithm has been made available to the scientific community via GitHub as an ImageJ-plugin.

Indexed as

Ear, InnerEndolymphatic HydropsAdultAgedGadoliniumHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesGadoliniumAutomatic segmentationContrast agentEndolymphatic hydropsInner earIntravenous applicationLocal thresholdingMRIVolumetric

Identifiers

PMID32666134
PMCPMC7718192
OpenAlexW3043519368

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.