Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32665995›Full record

ArticleInvestigative and clinical urology2020

Determinants of neoadjuvant chemotherapy use in muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

Filipe Lf Carvalho, Alexander Zeymo, Jillian Egan, Colleen H Kelly, Chaoyi Zheng, John H Lynch, Jonathan Hwang, Lambros Stamatakis, Ross E Krasnow, Keith J Kowalczyk

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Investigative and clinical urology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Filipe Lf CarvalhoDepartment of Urology, Medstar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2378-6512
Alexander ZeymoMedStar Health Research Institute, Hyattsville, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3278-7309
Jillian EganDepartment of Urology, Medstar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6934-3827
Colleen H KellySchool of Medicine, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0546-9337
Chaoyi ZhengDepartment of Biostatistics, Bioinformatics, and Biomathematics, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1688-7585
John H LynchDepartment of Urology, Medstar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4231-0416
Jonathan HwangDepartment of Urology, Medstar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8436-1406
Lambros StamatakisDepartment of Urology, Medstar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2955-6411
Ross E KrasnowDepartment of Urology, Medstar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9773-9431
Keith J KowalczykDepartment of Urology, Medstar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3081-6815
MedStar Washington Hospital Center · USGeorgetown University · USMedStar Health · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by radical cystectomy (RC) is standard of care for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). However, NAC is used in less than 20% of patients with MIBC. Our goal is to investigate factors that contribute to underutilization NAC to facilitate more routine incorporation into clinical practice. Materials and Methods: We identified 5,915 patients diagnosed with cT2-T3N0M0 MIBC who underwent RC between 2004 and 2014 from the National Cancer Database. Univariate and multivariable models were created to identify variables associated with NAC utilization. Results: Only 18.8% of patients received NAC during the study period. On univariate analyses, NAC utilization was more likely at academic hospitals, US South and Midwest (p<0.05). Higher Charlson score was associated with decrease use of NAC (p<0.05). On multivariate analysis, treatment in academic hospitals (odds ratio [OR], 1.367; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.186-1.576), in the Midwest (OR, 1.538; 95% CI, 1.268-1.977) and South (OR, 1.424; 95% CI, 1.139-1.781) were independently associated with NAC utilization. Older age (75 to 84 years old; OR, 0.532; 95% CI, 0.427-0.664) and higher Charlson score (OR, 0.607; 95% CI, 0.439-0.839) were associated with decreased NAC utilization. Sixty-eight percent of patients did not receive NAC because it was not planned and only 2.5% of patients had contraindications for NAC treatment. Conclusions: Our study demonstrates that NAC is underutilized. Decreased utilization of NAC was associated with older patients and higher Charlson score. This underutilization may be related to practice patterns as very few patients have true contraindications.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic AgentsChemotherapy, AdjuvantCisplatinFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant TherapyNeoplasm InvasivenessRetrospective StudiesUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsYoung AdultAntineoplastic AgentsCisplatinAntineoplastic agentsCystectomyUrinary bladder neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID32665995
PMCPMC7329637
OpenAlexW3015088270

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.