Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32665826›Full record

ArticleAoB PLANTS2020

Effect of heterospecific pollen deposition on pollen tube growth depends on the phylogenetic relatedness between donor and recipient.

Nathália Susin Streher, Pedro Joaquim Bergamo, Tia-Lynn Ashman, Marina Wolowski, Marlies Sazima

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AoB PLANTS, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Landscape homogenization strengthens the fitness benefits of plant species' centrality in pollination networks.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Minimal impacts of invasiveFrontiers in plant science · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nathália Susin StreherGraduate Program in Plant Biology, University of Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil.
Pedro Joaquim BergamoGraduate Program in Ecology, University of Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil.
Tia-Lynn AshmanDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Marina WolowskiInstitute of Natural Sciences, Federal University of Alfenas, Alfenas, MG, Brazil.
Marlies SazimaPlant Biology Department, Institute of Biology, University of Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Co-flowering plant species may interact via pollinators leading to heterospecific pollen transfer with consequences for plant reproduction. What determines the severity of heterospecific pollen effect on conspecific pollen performance is unclear, but it may depend on the phylogenetic relatedness of the interactors (pollen donors and recipient). The heterospecific pollen effect might also depend on the extent to which plants are exposed to heterospecific pollen over ecological or evolutionary timescales. For instance, generalist-pollinated plant species might tolerate heterospecific pollen more than specialists. Here, we tested whether heterospecific pollen effects are stronger between closely related species than phylogenetically distant ones in a tropical highland community. Then, based on these results, we determined whether responses to heterospecific pollen were stronger in generalized vs. specialized plant species. We applied heterospecific pollen from close (congeneric) or distant (different families) donors alone or with conspecific pollen on stigmas of three recipient species (one generalist,

Indexed as

Competitionfacilitationinterspecific pollen transferpollen germinationpollinator sharing

Identifiers

PMID32665826
PMCPMC7333672

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.