Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32665738›Full record

ArticleBioscience2020

Machine Learning Using Digitized Herbarium Specimens to Advance Phenological Research.

Katelin D Pearson, Gil Nelson, Myla F J Aronson, Pierre Bonnet, Laura Brenskelle, Charles C Davis, Ellen G Denny, Elizabeth R Ellwood, Hervé Goëau, J Mason Heberling and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioscience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Ten best practices for effective phenological research.International journal of biometeorology · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Katelin D PearsonCalifornia Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, California.ORCID 0000-0003-4947-7662
Gil NelsonFlorida Museum of Natural History, Gainesville, Florida.
Myla F J AronsonDepartment of Ecology, Evolution, and Natural Resources, Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New Jersey.
Pierre BonnetAMAP, the University of Montpellier and with The French Agricultural Research Centre for International Development, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Institut de Recherche pour le Développement, Botanique et Modélisation de l'Architecture des Plantes et des végétations in Montpellier, France.
Laura BrenskelleFlorida Museum of Natural History, the University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.
Charles C DavisHarvard University Herbaria, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Ellen G DennyUS National Phenology Network and with the University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona.
Elizabeth R EllwoodNatural History Museum of Los Angeles County, La Brea Tar Pits and Museum, Los Angeles, California.
Hervé GoëauAMAP, the University of Montpellier and with The French Agricultural Research Centre for International Development, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Institut de Recherche pour le Développement, Botanique et Modélisation de l'Architecture des Plantes et des végétations in Montpellier, France.
J Mason HeberlingCarnegie Museum of Natural History, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.ORCID 0000-0003-0756-5090
Alexis JolyInria Sophia-Antipolis, Zenith team, Laboratoire d'Informatique, de Robotique et de Microélectronique de Montpellier (LIRMM), Montpellier, France.
Titouan LorieulInria Sophia-Antipolis, Zenith team, Laboratoire d'Informatique, de Robotique et de Microélectronique de Montpellier (LIRMM), Montpellier, France.
Susan J MazerDepartment of Ecology, Evolution, and Marine Biology, the University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California.
Emily K MeinekeDepartment of Entomology and Nematology, the University of California, Davis, Davis, California.
Brian J StuckyFlorida Museum of Natural History, the University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.
Patrick SweeneyYale Peabody Museum of Natural History, New Haven, Connecticut.
Alexander E WhiteDepartment of Botany and the Data Science Lab, the Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC.
Pamela S SoltisFlorida Museum of Natural History and with the University of Florida Biodiversity Institute, the University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Machine learning (ML) has great potential to drive scientific discovery by harvesting data from images of herbarium specimens-preserved plant material curated in natural history collections-but ML techniques have only recently been applied to this rich resource. ML has particularly strong prospects for the study of plant phenological events such as growth and reproduction. As a major indicator of climate change, driver of ecological processes, and critical determinant of plant fitness, plant phenology is an important frontier for the application of ML techniques for science and society. In the present article, we describe a generalized, modular ML workflow for extracting phenological data from images of herbarium specimens, and we discuss the advantages, limitations, and potential future improvements of this workflow. Strategic research and investment in specimen-based ML methods, along with the aggregation of herbarium specimen data, may give rise to a better understanding of life on Earth.

Indexed as

biodiversityclimate changedeep learningmachine learningphenology

Identifiers

PMID32665738
PMCPMC7340542

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.