Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32665645›Full record

ArticleNature communications2020

SARS-CoV-2 proteome microarray for global profiling of COVID-19 specific IgG and IgM responses.

He-Wei Jiang, Yang Li, Hai-Nan Zhang, Wei Wang, Xiao Yang, Huan Qi, Hua Li, Dong Men, Jie Zhou, Sheng-Ce Tao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 193 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
193citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

193 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Clinical applications of detecting IgG, IgM or IgA antibody for the diagnosis of COVID-19: A meta-analysis and systematic review.International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The main protease (MCommunications biology · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

133 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

He-Wei Jiang *Shanghai Center for Systems Biomedicine, Key Laboratory of Systems Biomedicine (Ministry of Education), Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 200240, Shanghai, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8700-7042
Yang Li *Shanghai Center for Systems Biomedicine, Key Laboratory of Systems Biomedicine (Ministry of Education), Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 200240, Shanghai, China.
Hai-Nan Zhang *Shanghai Center for Systems Biomedicine, Key Laboratory of Systems Biomedicine (Ministry of Education), Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 200240, Shanghai, China.
Wei Wang *Foshan Fourth People's Hospital, 528000, Foshan, China.
Xiao YangKey Laboratory of RNA Biology, Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 100101, Beijing, China.
Huan QiShanghai Center for Systems Biomedicine, Key Laboratory of Systems Biomedicine (Ministry of Education), Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 200240, Shanghai, China.
Hua LiBio-ID Center, School of Biomedical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 200240, Shanghai, China.
Dong MenState Key Laboratory of Virology, Wuhan Institute of Virology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 430071, Wuhan, China. d.men@wh.iov.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1190-9570
Jie ZhouFoshan Fourth People's Hospital, 528000, Foshan, China. zjet65@163.com.
Sheng-Ce TaoShanghai Center for Systems Biomedicine, Key Laboratory of Systems Biomedicine (Ministry of Education), Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 200240, Shanghai, China. taosc@sjtu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9210-1823

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 31900112
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We still know very little about how the human immune system responds to SARS-CoV-2. Here we construct a SARS-CoV-2 proteome microarray containing 18 out of the 28 predicted proteins and apply it to the characterization of the IgG and IgM antibodies responses in the sera from 29 convalescent patients. We find that all these patients had IgG and IgM antibodies that specifically bind SARS-CoV-2 proteins, particularly the N protein and S1 protein. Besides these proteins, significant antibody responses to ORF9b and NSP5 are also identified. We show that the S1 specific IgG signal positively correlates with age and the level of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and negatively correlates with lymphocyte percentage. Overall, this study presents a systemic view of the SARS-CoV-2 specific IgG and IgM responses and provides insights to aid the development of effective diagnostic, therapeutic and vaccination strategies.

Indexed as

AdultAntibodies, ViralBetacoronavirusCoronavirus 3C ProteasesCoronavirus InfectionsCoronavirus Nucleocapsid ProteinsCOVID-19Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFemaleHumansImmunoglobulin GImmunoglobulin ML-Lactate DehydrogenaseMaleMiddle AgedNucleocapsid Proteins3C-like proteinase, SARS-CoV-2Antibodies, ViralCoronavirus 3C ProteasesCoronavirus Nucleocapsid ProteinsImmunoglobulin GImmunoglobulin ML-Lactate Dehydrogenasenucleocapsid phosphoprotein, SARS-CoV-2Nucleocapsid ProteinsPhosphoproteinsProteomeSpike Glycoprotein, Coronavirusspike protein, SARS-CoV-2Viral Nonstructural Proteins

Identifiers

PMID32665645
PMCPMC7360742

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.