Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32665620›Full record

Observational studyScientific reports2020

A nomogram model for screening the risk of diabetes in a large-scale Chinese population: an observational study from 345,718 participants.

Mingyue Xue, Yinxia Su, Zhiwei Feng, Shuxia Wang, Mingchen Zhang, Kai Wang, Hua Yao

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Uncurtaining the pivotal role of ABC transporters in diabetes mellitus.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2021
    Review
  6. Nomogram Model for Screening the Risk of Type II Diabetes in Western Xinjiang, China.Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mingyue XueCollege of Public Health, Xinjiang Medical University, Ürümqi, 830011, China.
Yinxia SuCenter of Health Management, The First Affiliated Hospital, Xinjiang Medical University, Ürümqi, 830011, China.
Zhiwei FengCollege of Basic Medicine, Xinjiang Medical University, Ürümqi, 830011, China.
Shuxia WangCenter of Health Management, The First Affiliated Hospital, Xinjiang Medical University, Ürümqi, 830011, China.
Mingchen ZhangThe First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Ürümqi, 830011, China.
Kai WangCollege of Medical Engineering and Technology, Xinjiang Medical University, Ürümqi, 830011, China. wangkaimath@sina.com.
Hua YaoCenter of Health Management, The First Affiliated Hospital, Xinjiang Medical University, Ürümqi, 830011, China. yaohua01@sina.com.
First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University · CNXinjiang Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our study is major to establish and validate a simple type||diabetes mellitus (T2DM) screening model for identifying high-risk individuals among Chinese adults. A total of 643,439 subjects who participated in the national health examination had been enrolled in this cross-sectional study. After excluding subjects with missing data or previous medical history, 345,718 adults was included in the final analysis. We used the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator models to optimize feature selection, and used multivariable logistic regression analysis to build a predicting model. The results showed that the major risk factors of T2DM were age, gender, no drinking or drinking/time > 25 g, no exercise, smoking, waist-to-height ratio, heart rate, systolic blood pressure, fatty liver and gallbladder disease. The area under ROC was 0.811 for development group and 0.814 for validation group, and the p values of the two calibration curves were 0.053 and 0.438, the improvement of net reclassification and integrated discrimination are significant in our model. Our results give a clue that the screening models we conducted may be useful for identifying Chinses adults at high risk for diabetes. Further studies are needed to evaluate the utility and feasibility of this model in various settings.

Indexed as

NomogramsPopulation SurveillanceAdultBlood PressureBody Mass IndexChinaCross-Sectional StudiesDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2FemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPopulationRisk FactorsWaist-Height Ratio

Identifiers

PMID32665620
PMCPMC7360758
OpenAlexW3042570497

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.