Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32665595›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Microbiology2020

The LUCA and its complex virome.

Mart Krupovic, Valerian V Dolja, Eugene V Koonin

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Microbiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 66 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
66citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

66 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Biofilms in modern CaCOScientific reports · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. A New View of the Last Universal Common Ancestor.Journal of molecular evolution · 2024
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mart KrupovicArchaeal Virology Unit, Institut Pasteur, Paris, France. mart.krupovic@pasteur.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5486-0098
Valerian V DoljaDepartment of Botany and Plant Pathology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA.
Eugene V KooninNational Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, MD, USA. koonin@ncbi.nlm.nih.gov.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3943-8299

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The last universal cellular ancestor (LUCA) is the most recent population of organisms from which all cellular life on Earth descends. The reconstruction of the genome and phenotype of the LUCA is a major challenge in evolutionary biology. Given that all life forms are associated with viruses and/or other mobile genetic elements, there is no doubt that the LUCA was a host to viruses. Here, by projecting back in time using the extant distribution of viruses across the two primary domains of life, bacteria and archaea, and tracing the evolutionary histories of some key virus genes, we attempt a reconstruction of the LUCA virome. Even a conservative version of this reconstruction suggests a remarkably complex virome that already included the main groups of extant viruses of bacteria and archaea. We further present evidence of extensive virus evolution antedating the LUCA. The presence of a highly complex virome implies the substantial genomic and pan-genomic complexity of the LUCA itself.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularVirusesArchaeaBacteriaCapsid ProteinsGenome, ViralViral ProteinsViromeCapsid ProteinsViral Proteins

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.