ArticleNature communications2020
Avoiding dynastic, assortative mating, and population stratification biases in Mendelian randomization through within-family analyses.
Article in Nature communications, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 244 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
244 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 409 citations in OpenAlex.
- Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology using Mendelian randomization (STROBE-MR): a Korean translation of explanation and elaboration.Ewha medical journal · 2025Guideline
- Associations between psoriasis and risk of 33 cancers: a Mendelian randomization study.BMC cancer · 2025Pooled it
- Role of lifestyle factors in mediating the effect of educational attainment on bone mineral density: a Mendelian randomization study.Archives of osteoporosis · 2023Pooled it
- Tools for assessing quality and risk of bias in Mendelian randomization studies: a systematic review.International journal of epidemiology · 2023Pooled it
- Cross-fitted instrument: A blueprint for one-sample Mendelian randomization.PLoS computational biology · 2022Pooled it
- Multivariate GWAS framework for family trios with parental phenotypes to control dynastic effects.BMC bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Childhood Correlates of Genetic Propensity to Personality Traits.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Association Between Socioeconomic Status and Atrial Fibrillation: A Two-Sample Mendelian Randomization Study.Annals of noninvasive electrocardiology : the official journal of the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology, Inc · 2026Article
- Beyond years of schooling: Genetic associations across educational milestones in two Norwegian cohorts.PLoS genetics · 2026Article
- Investigating relationships between loneliness, social isolation and health.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Comparison of methods for assessing effects of risk factors on disease progression in Mendelian randomization under index event bias.American journal of human genetics · 2026Article
- Causal inference in psychiatric research: how to critically evaluate and interpret mendelian randomization studies.Molecular psychiatry · 2026Review
- The influence of unhealthy lifestyle on semen quality: results from a cross-sectional study and Mendelian randomization analysis.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Article
- Evaluating confounding in rare variant genome wide association studies.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Genome-wide association study of positive and negative affect reveals shared genetic architecture and a potential causal relationship with cognition.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- The tissue-specific effects of glucose-lowering drug targets on aging mediated through DNA methylation: a multi-omics genetic study.BMC medicine · 2026Article
- Genomic-Relatedness Matching Expands Population Coverage, Improves Power, and Reduces Bias in Genetic Association Analyses.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Estimating uncertainty in family-based GWAS.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Adolescent wellbeing is associated with positive outcomes in early adulthood in a sibling comparison study.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Challenges and future directions for Mendelian randomization.Nature genetics · 2026Review
184 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
35 authors at 15 institutions in 8 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Estimates from Mendelian randomization studies of unrelated individuals can be biased due to uncontrolled confounding from familial effects. Here we describe methods for within-family Mendelian randomization analyses and use simulation studies to show that family-based analyses can reduce such biases. We illustrate empirically how familial effects can affect estimates using data from 61,008 siblings from the Nord-Trøndelag Health Study and UK Biobank and replicated our findings using 222,368 siblings from 23andMe. Both Mendelian randomization estimates using unrelated individuals and within family methods reproduced established effects of lower BMI reducing risk of diabetes and high blood pressure. However, while Mendelian randomization estimates from samples of unrelated individuals suggested that taller height and lower BMI increase educational attainment, these effects were strongly attenuated in within-family Mendelian randomization analyses. Our findings indicate the necessity of controlling for population structure and familial effects in Mendelian randomization studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.