Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32665552›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Angiogenesis Analyzer for ImageJ - A comparative morphometric analysis of "Endothelial Tube Formation Assay" and "Fibrin Bead Assay".

Gilles Carpentier, Sarah Berndt, Ségolène Ferratge, Wayne Rasband, Muriel Cuendet, Georges Uzan, Patricia Albanese

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 357 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
357citing papers in PubMed
21.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

357 citing papers in PubMed, 582 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

297 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Gilles CarpentierGly-CRRET Research Unit 4397, Université Paris-Est Créteil, 61 avenue du général de Gaulle, 94010, Créteil, France. carpentier@u-pec.fr.
Sarah BerndtSchool of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Université de Genève, Rue Michel Servet 1, 1211, Geneva, 4, Switzerland.
Ségolène FerratgeINSERM U 1197, Hôpital Paul Brousse, Villejuif, France.
Wayne RasbandU. S. National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Muriel CuendetSchool of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Université de Genève, Rue Michel Servet 1, 1211, Geneva, 4, Switzerland.
Georges Uzan *INSERM U 1197, Hôpital Paul Brousse, Villejuif, France.
Patricia Albanese *Gly-CRRET Research Unit 4397, Université Paris-Est Créteil, 61 avenue du général de Gaulle, 94010, Créteil, France.
Inserm · FRUniversity of Geneva · CHLaboratoire de Recherche sur la Croissance Cellulaire, la Réparation et la Régénération Tissulaires · FRNational Institutes of Health · USUniversité Paris-Est Créteil · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Angiogenesis assays based on in vitro capillary-like growth of endothelial cells (EC) are widely used, either to evaluate the effect of anti- and pro-angiogenesis drugs of interest, or to test and compare the functional capacities of various types of EC and progenitor cells. Among the different methods applied to study angiogenesis, the most commonly used is the "Endothelial Tube Formation Assay" (ETFA). In suitable culture conditions, EC form two-dimensional (2D) branched structures that can lead to a meshed pseudo-capillary network. An alternative approach to ETFA is the "Fibrin Bead Assay" (FBA), based on the use of Cytodex 3 microspheres, which promote the growth of 3D capillary-like patterns from coated EC, suitable for high throughput in vitro angiogenesis studies. The analytical evaluation of these two widely used assays still remains challenging in terms of observation method and image analysis. We previously developed the "Angiogenesis Analyzer" for ImageJ (AA), a tool allowing analysis of ETFA-derived images, according to characteristics of the pseudo-capillary networks. In this work, we developed and implemented a new algorithm for AA able to recognize microspheres and to analyze the attached capillary-like structures from the FBA model. Such a method is presented for the first time in fully automated mode and using non-destructive image acquisition. We detailed these two algorithms and used the new AA version to compare both methods (i.e. ETFA and FBA) in their efficiency, accuracy and statistical relevance to model angiogenesis patterns of Human Umbilical Vein EC (HUVEC). Although the two methods do not assess the same biological step, our data suggest that they display specific and complementary information on the angiogenesis processes analysis.

Indexed as

EndotheliumFibrinHumansHuman Umbilical Vein Endothelial CellsMorphogenesisNeovascularization, PathologicNeovascularization, PhysiologicVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AFibrinVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AVEGFA protein, human

Identifiers

PMID32665552
PMCPMC7360583
OpenAlexW3042689819

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.