Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32665358›Full record

ArticleTobacco control2020

Assessing cigarette packaging and labelling policy effects on early adolescents: results from a discrete choice experiment.

Inti Barrientos-Gutierrez, Farahnaz Islam, Yoo Jin Cho, Ramzi George Salloum, Jordan Louviere, Edna Arillo-Santillán, Luz Myriam Reynales-Shigematsu, Joaquin Barnoya, Belen Saenz de Miera Juarez, James Hardin and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tobacco control, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The Use of Packaging Descriptors in a Rapidly Growing Market for Capsule Cigarettes: Evidence From Mexico.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Impact of Visual Elements of Tobacco Packaging on Health Risk Perceptions of Youth Groups.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Inti Barrientos-GutierrezTobacco Research Department, National Institute of Public Health, Cuernavaca, Mexico.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9094-8185
Farahnaz IslamDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA.
Yoo Jin ChoDepartment of Health Promotion, Education and Behavior, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9590-9206
Ramzi George SalloumHealth Outcomes and Policy, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8139-2418
Jordan LouviereSchool of Marketing, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Edna Arillo-SantillánTobacco Research Department, National Institute of Public Health, Cuernavaca, Mexico.
Luz Myriam Reynales-ShigematsuTobacco Research Department, National Institute of Public Health, Cuernavaca, Mexico.
Joaquin BarnoyaDivision of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Mississippi, USA.
Belen Saenz de Miera JuarezDepartment of Economics, Universidad Autonoma de Baja California Sur, La Paz, Mexico.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3117-0734
James HardinDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA.
James F ThrasherTobacco Research Department, National Institute of Public Health, Cuernavaca, Mexico thrasher@mailbox.sc.edu.

Funding

Cinema Smoking and Youth Smoking in Latin AmericaR01TW009274 · FIC · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI SARGENT, JAMES D., THRASHER, JAMES · 2012 to 2016
$1.8M
Electronic cigarettes in Latin America: Evaluation of impacts and policy optionsR01TW010652 · FIC · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · PI BARNOYA, JOAQUIN, THRASHER, JAMES · 2018 to 2021
$1.6M
FIC NIH HHS R01 TW009274FIC NIH HHS R01 TW010652
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCigarette packaging is a primary channel for tobacco advertising, particularly in countries where traditional channels are restricted. The current study evaluated the independent and interactive effects of cigarette packaging and health warning label (HWL) characteristics on perceived appeal of cigarette brands for early adolescents in Mexico.

methodsA discrete choice experiment (DCE) was conducted with early adolescents, aged 12-14 years (n=4251). The DCE involved a 3×2

resultsParticipants perceived packs as less attractive, less interesting to try and more harmful if they had plain packaging or had larger HWLs, with the effect being most pronounced when plain packaging is combined with larger HWLs. For attractiveness, plain packaging had the biggest influence on choice (43%), followed by HWL size (19%). Interest in trying was most influenced by brand name (34%), followed by plain packaging (29%). Perceived harm was most influenced by brand name (30%), followed by HWL size (29%).

conclusionIncreasing the size of HWLs and implementing plain packaging appear to reduce the appeal of cigarettes to early adolescents. Countries should adopt these policies to minimise the impact of tobacco marketing.

Indexed as

advertising and promotionlow/middle income countrypackaging and labellingprevention

Identifiers

PMID32665358
PMCPMC7855531

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.