Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32665349›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2020

Delivery of community-centred public mental health interventions in diverse areas in England: a mapping study protocol.

Fiona H Duncan, Mike McGrath, Cleo Baskin, David Osborn, Jen Dykxhoorn, Eileen F S Kaner, Shamini Gnani, Louise LaFortune, Caroline Lee, Kate R Walters and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Fiona H DuncanDepartment of Sport and Exercise Sciences, Durham University, Durham, UK fiona.h.duncan@durham.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-4929-5685
Mike McGrathDivision of Psychiatry, UCL, London, UK.
Cleo BaskinDepartment of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College, London, UK.
David OsbornDivision of Psychiatry, UCL, London, UK.
Jen DykxhoornDivision of Psychiatry, UCL, London, UK.
Eileen F S KanerInstitute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Shamini GnaniDepartment of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College, London, UK.
Louise LaFortuneInstitute of Public Health, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Caroline LeeInstitute of Public Health, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Kate R WaltersDepartment of Primary Care and Population Health, UCL, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2173-2430
James KirkbrideDivision of Psychiatry, UCL, London, UK.
Laura FischerMcPin Foundation, London, UK.
Oli JonesMcPin Foundation, London, UK.
Vanessa PinfoldMcPin Foundation, London, UK.
Jude StansfieldHealth Improvement Directorate, Public Health England, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7989-5630
Emily J OliverDepartment of Sport and Exercise Sciences, Durham University, Durham, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1795-8448
NIHR SPHR Public Mental Health Programme.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPublic mental health (PMH) is a global challenge and a UK priority area for action. However, to progress, practitioners require a stronger evidence base regarding the effectiveness of approaches, particularly regarding promotion and prevention through community-centred interventions. In addition, policy-makers need to understand what is being delivered, particularly in areas of high need, to identify promising practices or gaps in PMH provision. Finally, and importantly, the public need better information regarding what approaches and services are available to them. We report a protocol designed to (1) identify the types of community-centred interventions used in purposively selected diverse geographical areas of England to improve PMH outcomes and (2) describe the type, target population, content and outcome measures of each intervention. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Five local authority areas of England were selected based on either high social deprivation or differing ethnic population statistics and geographical locations. Community-centred interventions in each area will be identified through: (1) desk-based data capture from standardised searches of publicly-available information (eg, policy, strategy and intervention advertising), (2) established professional networks and service contacts, (3) chain-referral sampling of individuals involved in local mental health promotion and prevention and (4) peer researchers, who will use their personal experience and local knowledge to help identify potentially relevant organisations. Data on the key features of the interventions will be extracted from individuals either by structured interviews or by electronic questionnaires with information regarding the intervention(s) of which they have knowledge. Initial data analysis will involve tabulating descriptive information and grouping interventions according to intervention type, target population, risk/protective factor and intended primary outcome. A descriptive comparison will be made between selected geographical areas. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval was obtained from Durham University's Department of Sport and Exercise Sciences Research Ethics Committee. We plan to disseminate our findings at relevant conferences, meetings and through peer-reviewed journals. We also plan to disseminate to the public and intervention providers through social media and/or newsletters.

Indexed as

Mental HealthSportsEnglandExerciseHealth PromotionHumansadult psychiatryhealth policymental healthpublic health

Identifiers

PMID32665349
PMCPMC7359052

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.