Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32665346›Full record

Observational studyBMJ open2020

Cardiovascular disease risk perception in a Hungarian community sample: psychometric evaluation of the ABCD Risk Perception Questionnaire.

Tamas Martos, Márta Csabai, Zsolt Bagyura, Zsófia Ocsovszky, Beatrix Rafael, Viola Sallay, Béla Merkely

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Validation of Risk Perception Cut-Offs in Italian Brief PRHDS (PRHDS-BI): Implications for Primary Cardiovascular Prevention.High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension · 2026
    Observational
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tamas MartosInstitute of Psychology, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary tamas.martos@psy.u-szeged.hu.ORCID 0000-0001-5946-1299
Márta CsabaiInstitute of Psychology, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.
Zsolt BagyuraHeart and Vascular Center, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Zsófia OcsovszkyHeart and Vascular Center, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Beatrix RafaelInstitute of Psychology, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.
Viola SallayInstitute of Psychology, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.
Béla MerkelyHeart and Vascular Center, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Semmelweis University · HU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesReliable and valid assessment of subjective risk perception is a crucial part of cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention and rehabilitation. Since the recently developed Attitudes and Beliefs about Cardiovascular Disease (ABCD) Risk Questionnaire complies with these requirements, the aim of the present study was to investigate the psychometric properties of the Hungarian version of the measure. DESIGN AND

settingCommunity-based cross-sectional observational study

participantsIn sum, 410 (M=49.53 years, SD=8.09) Hungarian adults (inclusion criteria: aged 35 and above, not under treatment with a psychiatric disorder) were included in the present study (female: n=277, 67.6%; college or university-level education: n=247, 60.2%).

methodsWe translated the ABCD Risk Questionnaire into Hungarian and checked its psychometric properties and validity indices. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Internal consistency, explorative and confirmative factorial validity. Associations with sociodemographic and health-related characteristics, as well as with measures of mental health (depressive symptoms, perceived stress and well-being).

resultsExploratory and confirmatory factor analyses supported a three-factor solution, corresponding to the original subscales of Risk Perception, Perceived Benefits and Healthy Eating Intentions, with a moderate correlation between the latent constructs. The respondents' level of knowledge on CVD risk factors was largely independent of their subjective risk perception. The results also provided evidence on the weak-to-medium associations between mental health indices and CVD-related perceptions. Based on the results, a shortened scale version was also suggested.

conclusionThis study confirms the factorial structure, internal consistency and validity of the Hungarian version of the ABCD Risk Questionnaire in a non-English-speaking community sample. The ABCD Risk Perception Questionnaire is a parsimonious and psychometrically adequate measure to assess CVD-related attitudes and knowledge in the general population. Further research is needed in socioeconomically more diverse and in clinical samples, as well as in longitudinal intervention studies.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeSurveys and QuestionnairesAdultCardiovascular DiseasesCross-Sectional StudiesFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleHumansHungaryMaleMental HealthMiddle AgedPerceptionPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsRisk Factorscardiac epidemiologymental healthrisk managementstatistics & research methods

Identifiers

PMID32665346
PMCPMC7359054
OpenAlexW3043521898

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.