Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32665221›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of ophthalmology2021

Is intravitreal topotecan toxic to retinal function?

Jennifer Nadelmann, Jasmine H Francis, Scott E Brodie, Engjel Muca, David H Abramson

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of ophthalmology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06425419 (The Safety and Efficacy of Intravitreal Topotecan for the Treatment of Proliferative Vitreoretinopathy), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06425419 phase1not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

The Safety and Efficacy of Intravitreal Topotecan for the Treatment of Proliferative Vitreoretinopathy

TypeinterventionalSponsorMassachusetts Eye and Ear InfirmaryRan2026 to 2028Enrolled50ConditionsProliferative Vitreoretinopathy, Proliferative Vitreo-Retinopathy, Rhegmatogenous Retinal DetachmentArmsTopotecan
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jennifer NadelmannOphthalmic Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA jennifer.nadelmann@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-7021-9986
Jasmine H FrancisOphthalmic Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1889-3447
Scott E BrodieNYU Langone Health, New York, New York, USA.
Engjel MucaOphthalmic Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
David H AbramsonOphthalmic Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USNYU Langone Health · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntravitreal injections of topotecan are used in the management of retinoblastoma with vitreous seeds. This study evaluated whether intravitreal topotecan was associated with retinal toxicity.

methodsRetrospective cohort study of patients with retinoblastoma who were treated with intravitreal topotecan at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center between December 2014 and May 2019. Electroretinogram (ERG) responses under anaesthesia were measured immediately before treatment with intravitreal topotecan and at the next visitor approximately one-month. Ocular toxicity was defined by a decrease in the ERG response at 30 Hz at follow-up.

resultsOcular toxicity was evaluated by ERG on 50 evaluable injections administered to 28 eyes. 22 (44.0%) injections were performed with concurrent intravitreal melphalan. The median time to ERG measurement following an injection was 27 days. By using a paired t-test, intravitreal topotecan combined with melphalan (n=22) at a dose of 25 μg or 30 μg was associated with a significant decrease in ERG amplitude at follow-up (p=0.046, 95% CI -20.4 μV to -0.2 μV). Among eyes that only received topotecan (n=28) at doses of 20 μg or 30 μg, there was not a significant difference in ERG amplitude measured (p=0.85, 95% CI -7.0 μV to 5.8 μV).

conclusionIntravitreal topotecan combined with intravitreal melphalan was associated with a decrease in ERG amplitude; there was not a significant decrease in ERG amplitude observed in patients who received topotecan alone. These findings suggest that intravitreal topotecan injections at doses of 20 μg or 30 μg are not associated with retinal toxicity in patients with retinoblastoma.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Agents, AlkylatingAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsElectroretinographyFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansInfantIntravitreal InjectionsMaleMelphalanRetinaRetinal NeoplasmsRetinoblastomaRetrospective StudiesTopoisomerase I InhibitorsTopotecanAntineoplastic Agents, AlkylatingMelphalanTopoisomerase I InhibitorsTopotecanElectrophysiologyNeoplasiaPharmacologyRetinaTreatment Medical

Identifiers

PMID32665221
PMCPMC9446382
OpenAlexW3043223136

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.