Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32665035›Full record

ArticleTrials2020

Multicenter randomized clinical trial of endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke. The effect of periprocedural medication: acetylsalicylic acid, unfractionated heparin, both, or neither (MR CLEAN-MED). Rationale and study design.

Vicky Chalos, Rob A van de Graaf, Bob Roozenbeek, Adriaan C G M van Es, Heleen M den Hertog, Julie Staals, Lukas van Dijk, Sjoerd F M Jenniskens, Robert J van Oostenbrugge, Wim H van Zwam and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. M2 vessel occlusion characteristics and outcome after endovascular therapy: A post-hoc pooled analysis of MR CLEAN MED, NO-IV and LATE.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Diagnosis and management ofEuropean journal of radiology open · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Vicky ChalosDepartment of Neurology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Rob A van de GraafDepartment of Neurology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Bob RoozenbeekDepartment of Neurology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. b.roozenbeek@erasmusmc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8320-8303
Adriaan C G M van EsDepartment of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Heleen M den HertogDepartment of Neurology, Isala, Zwolle, The Netherlands.
Julie StaalsDepartment of Neurology, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Lukas van DijkDepartment of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, HagaZiekenhuis, Radiology, Den Haag, The Netherlands.
Sjoerd F M JenniskensDepartment of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Robert J van OostenbruggeDepartment of Neurology, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Wim H van ZwamDepartment of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Yvo B W E M RoosDepartment of Neurology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Charles B L M MajoieDepartment of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Hester F LingsmaDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Aad van der LugtDepartment of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Diederik W J DippelDepartment of Neurology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
MR CLEAN-MED investigators
Erasmus MC · NLMaastricht University · NLAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NLHaga Hospital · NLIsala · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite evidence of a quite large beneficial effect of endovascular treatment (EVT) for ischemic stroke caused by anterior circulation large vessel occlusion, many patients do not recover even after complete recanalization. To some extent, this may be attributable to incomplete microvascular reperfusion, which can possibly be improved by antiplatelet agents and heparin. It is unknown whether periprocedural antithrombotic medication in patients treated with EVT improves functional outcome. The aim of this study is to assess the effect of acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) and unfractionated heparin (UFH), alone, or in combination, given to patients with an ischemic stroke caused by an intracranial large vessel occlusion in the anterior circulation during EVT.

methodsMR CLEAN-MED is a multicenter phase III trial with a prospective, 2 × 3 factorial randomized, open label, blinded end-point (PROBE) design, which aims to enroll 1500 patients. The trial is designed to evaluate the effect of intravenous ASA (300 mg), UFH (low or moderate dose), both or neither as adjunctive therapy to EVT. We enroll adult patients with a clinical diagnosis of stroke (NIHSS ≥ 2) and with a confirmed intracranial large vessel occlusion in the anterior circulation on CTA or MRA, when EVT within 6 h from symptom onset is indicated and possible. The primary outcome is the score on the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 90 days. Treatment effect on the mRS will be estimated with ordinal logistic regression analysis, with adjustment for main prognostic variables. Secondary outcomes include stroke severity measured with the NIHSS at 24 h and at 5-7 days, follow-up infarct volume, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), and mortality. DISCUSSION: Clinical equipoise exists whether antithrombotic medication should be administered during EVT for a large vessel occlusion, as ASA and/or UFH may improve functional outcome, but might also lead to an increased risk of sICH. When one or both of the study treatments show the anticipated effect on outcome, we will be able to improve outcome of patients treated with EVT by 5%. This amounts to more than 50 patients annually in the Netherlands, more than 1800 in Europe, and more than 1300 in the USA.

trial registrationISRCT, ISRCTN76741621 . Dec 6, 2017.

Indexed as

Endovascular ProceduresAdultAspirinBrain IschemiaHeparinHumansIschemic StrokeMulticenter Studies as TopicProspective StudiesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicThrombectomyTreatment OutcomeAspirinHeparinAcetylsalicylic acidCerebrovascular disordersEndovascular treatmentHeparinIschemic strokePeriproceduralRandomized controlled trialThrombectomy

Identifiers

PMID32665035
PMCPMC7362523
OpenAlexW3043456764

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.