Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32665032›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2020

Measuring mosquito control: adult-mosquito catches vs egg-trap data as endpoints of a cluster-randomized controlled trial of mosquito-disseminated pyriproxyfen.

Klauss K S Garcia, Hanid S Versiani, Taís O Araújo, João P A Conceição, Marcos T Obara, Walter M Ramalho, Thaís T C Minuzzi-Souza, Gustavo D Gomes, Elisa N Vianna, Renata V Timbó and 11 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Impact of SumiLarvParasites & vectors · 2024
    Article
  8. The greatest Dengue epidemic in Brazil: Surveillance, Prevention, and Control.Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical · 2024
    Review
  9. New tools for Aedes control: mass trapping.Current opinion in insect science · 2022
    Review
  10. Surveillance and Control of Culex quinquefasciatus Using Autocidal Gravid Ovitraps.Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Stage-specific action of juvenile hormone analogs.Journal of pesticide science · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Klauss K S GarciaNúcleo de Medicina Tropical, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Brasília, Brasilia, Brazil.
Hanid S VersianiLaboratório de Parasitologia Médica e Biologia de Vetores, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Brasília, Brasilia, Brazil.
Taís O AraújoLaboratório de Parasitologia Médica e Biologia de Vetores, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Brasília, Brasilia, Brazil.
João P A ConceiçãoNúcleo de Medicina Tropical, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Brasília, Brasilia, Brazil.
Marcos T ObaraNúcleo de Medicina Tropical, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Brasília, Brasilia, Brazil.
Walter M RamalhoNúcleo de Medicina Tropical, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Brasília, Brasilia, Brazil.
Thaís T C Minuzzi-SouzaSecretaria de Vigilância em Saúde, Ministério da Saúde, Brasilia, Brazil.
Gustavo D GomesLaboratório de Parasitologia Médica e Biologia de Vetores, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Brasília, Brasilia, Brazil.
Elisa N ViannaSecretaria de Vigilância em Saúde, Ministério da Saúde, Brasilia, Brazil.
Renata V TimbóLaboratório de Parasitologia Médica e Biologia de Vetores, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Brasília, Brasilia, Brazil.
Vinicios G C BarbosaLaboratório de Parasitologia Médica e Biologia de Vetores, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Brasília, Brasilia, Brazil.
Maridalva S P RezendeLaboratório de Parasitologia Médica e Biologia de Vetores, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Brasília, Brasilia, Brazil.
Luciana P F MartinsLaboratório de Parasitologia Médica e Biologia de Vetores, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Brasília, Brasilia, Brazil.
Glauco O MacedoLaboratório de Parasitologia Médica e Biologia de Vetores, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Brasília, Brasilia, Brazil.
Bruno L CarvalhoNúcleo de Medicina Tropical, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Brasília, Brasilia, Brazil.
Israel M MoreiraDiretoria de Vigilância Ambiental em Saúde, Subsecretaria de Vigilância à Saúde, Secretaria de Estado de Saúde do Distrito Federal, Brasilia, Brazil.
Lorrainy A BartassonDiretoria de Vigilância Ambiental em Saúde, Subsecretaria de Vigilância à Saúde, Secretaria de Estado de Saúde do Distrito Federal, Brasilia, Brazil.
Nadjar NitzLaboratório de Parasitologia Médica e Biologia de Vetores, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Brasília, Brasilia, Brazil.
Sérgio L B LuzInstituto Leônidas e Maria Deane-Fiocruz Amazônia, Manaus, Brazil.
Rodrigo Gurgel-GonçalvesNúcleo de Medicina Tropical, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Brasília, Brasilia, Brazil. gurgelrg@hotmail.com.
Fernando Abad-FranchNúcleo de Medicina Tropical, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Brasília, Brasilia, Brazil. abadfr@yahoo.com.

Funding

CSRD VA 1Fundação de Apoio à Pesquisa do Distrito Federal 6142
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAedes aegypti and Culex quinquefasciatus are the main urban vectors of arthropod-borne viruses causing human disease, including dengue, Zika, or West Nile. Although key to disease prevention, urban-mosquito control has met only limited success. Alternative vector-control tactics are therefore being developed and tested, often using entomological endpoints to measure impact. Here, we test one promising alternative and assess how three such endpoints perform at measuring its effects.

methodsWe conducted a 16-month, two-arm, cluster-randomized controlled trial (CRCT) of mosquito-disseminated pyriproxyfen (MD-PPF) in central-western Brazil. We used three entomological endpoints: adult-mosquito density as directly measured by active aspiration of adult mosquitoes, and egg-trap-based indices of female Aedes presence (proportion of positive egg-traps) and possibly abundance (number of eggs per egg-trap). Using generalized linear mixed models, we estimated MD-PPF effects on these endpoints while accounting for the non-independence of repeated observations and for intervention-unrelated sources of spatial-temporal variation.

resultsOn average, MD-PPF reduced adult-mosquito density by 66.3% (95% confidence interval, 95% CI: 47.3-78.4%); Cx. quinquefasciatus density fell by 55.5% (95% CI: 21.1-74.8%), and Ae. aegypti density by 60.0% (95% CI: 28.7-77.5%). In contrast, MD-PPF had no measurable effect on either Aedes egg counts or egg-trap positivity, both of which decreased somewhat in the intervention cluster but also in the control cluster. Egg-trap data, therefore, failed to reflect the 60.0% mean reduction of adult Aedes density associated with MD-PPF deployment.

conclusionsOur results suggest that the widely used egg-trap-based monitoring may poorly measure the impact of Aedes control; even if more costly, direct monitoring of the adult mosquito population is likely to provide a much more realistic and informative picture of intervention effects. In our CRCT, MD-PPF reduced adult-mosquito density by 66.3% in a medium-sized, spatially non-isolated, tropical urban neighborhood. Broader-scale trials will be necessary to measure MD-PPF impact on arboviral-disease transmission.

Indexed as

AedesAnimalsBrazilCulexHumansInsecticidesMosquito ControlMosquito VectorsPyridinesInsecticidesPyridinespyriproxyfenCluster randomized controlled trialMosquito-borne diseasesMosquito controlPyriproxyfenVector surveillance

Identifiers

PMID32665032
PMCPMC7362459

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.