Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32665030›Full record

ArticleCritical care (London, England)2020

Multicenter evaluation of a syndromic rapid multiplex PCR test for early adaptation of antimicrobial therapy in adult patients with pneumonia.

Céline Monard, Jonathan Pehlivan, Gabriel Auger, Sophie Alviset, Alexy Tran Dinh, Paul Duquaire, Nabil Gastli, Camille d'Humières, Adel Maamar, André Boibieux and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care (London, England), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed
8.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 121 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Clinical Impact of the BIOFIRE® FILMARRAY® Pneumonia Panel in the Veterans Affairs Healthcare System: A Difference-in-Differences Study.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2026
    Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Rapid testing with molecular syndromic panels of patients presenting at the emergency department with pneumonia at risk for multidrug-resistant pathogens.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Syndromic platforms in the management of infection in the critically ill patient: test indication and diagnostic interpretation.Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2025
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Céline MonardDépartement d'Anesthésie et Réanimation, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital E. Herriot, Lyon, France.
Jonathan PehlivanService de Réanimation Médicale Infectieuse, APHP, Hôpital Bichat Claude Bernard, Paris, France.
Gabriel AugerService de Bactériologie-Hygiène Hospitalière, CHU de Rennes, Rennes, France.
Sophie AlvisetEquipe Mobile d'Infectiologie, APHP, Hôpital Cochin, Centre Université de Paris, Paris, France.
Alexy Tran DinhDépartement d'anesthésie-réanimation, APHP, Hôpital Bichat-Claude Bernard, Université de Paris, Paris, France.
Paul DuquaireDépartement d'Anesthésie et Réanimation, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital E. Herriot, Lyon, France.
Nabil GastliService de Bactériologie, APHP, Hôpital Cochin, Centre Université de Paris, Paris, France.
Camille d'HumièresService de Bactériologie, APHP Nord, Université de Paris, Hôpital Bichat, Paris, France.
Adel MaamarService de Maladies Infectieuses et Réanimation Médicale, Hôpital Pontchaillou, Université de Rennes, Rennes, France.
André BoibieuxEquipe mobile d'infectiologie, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital E. Herriot, Lyon, France.
Marion BaldeyrouService de Maladies Infectieuses et Réanimation Médicale, CHU Rennes, Rennes, France.
Julien LoubinouxService de Bactériologie, AP-HP Centre, Hôpital Cochin, Université de Paris, Paris, France.
Olivier DauwalderPlateau de Microbiologie 24/24, Institut des Agents Infectieux, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Centre de Biologie et Pathologie Nord, Lyon, France.
Vincent CattoirService de Bactériologie-Hygiène Hospitalière, CHU de Rennes, Rennes, France.
Laurence Armand-LefèvreService de Bactériologie, APHP Nord, Université de Paris, Hôpital Bichat, Paris, France.
Solen KernéisEquipe Mobile d'Infectiologie, APHP, Hôpital Cochin, Centre Université de Paris, Paris, France. solen.kerneis@aphp.fr.
ADAPT study group
Inserm · FRUniversité Paris Cité · FRHospices Civils de Lyon · FRUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rennes · FRCNR de la Résistance aux Antibiotiques · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImproving timeliness of pathogen identification is crucial to allow early adaptation of antibiotic therapy and improve prognosis in patients with pneumonia. We evaluated the relevance of a new syndromic rapid multiplex PCR test (rm-PCR) on respiratory samples to guide empirical antimicrobial therapy in adult patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP), and ventilator-acquired pneumonia (VAP).

methodsThis retrospective multicenter study was conducted in four French university hospitals. Respiratory samples were obtained from patients with clinical and radiological signs of pneumonia and simultaneously tested using conventional microbiological methods and the rm-PCR. A committee composed of an intensivist, a microbiologist, and an infectious diseases specialist retrospectively assessed all medical files and agreed on the most appropriate antimicrobial therapy for each pneumonia episode, according to the results of rm-PCR and blinded to the culture results. The rm-PCR-guided antimicrobial regimen was compared to the empirical treatment routinely administered to the patient in standard care.

resultsWe included 159 pneumonia episodes. Most patients were hospitalized in intensive care units (n = 129, 81%), and episodes were HAP (n = 68, 43%), CAP (n = 54, 34%), and VAP (n = 37, 23%). Conventional culture isolated ≥ 1 microorganism(s) at significant level in 95 (60%) patients. The syndromic rm-PCR detected at least one bacteria in 132 (83%) episodes. Based on the results of the rm-PCR, the multidisciplinary committee proposed a modification of the empirical therapy in 123 (77%) pneumonia episodes. The modification was a de-escalation in 63 (40%), an escalation in 35 (22%), and undetermined in 25 (16%) patients. In microbiologically documented episodes (n = 95), the rm-PCR increased appropriateness of the empirical therapy to 83 (87%), as compared to 73 (77%) in routine care.

conclusionsUse of a syndromic rm-PCR test has the potential to reduce unnecessary antimicrobial exposure and increase the appropriateness of empirical antibiotic therapy in adult patients with pneumonia.

Indexed as

Time FactorsAdultAnti-Infective AgentsCommunity-Acquired InfectionsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMultiplex Polymerase Chain ReactionPneumoniaRetrospective StudiesAnti-Infective AgentsAntimicrobialsAntimicrobial stewardshipBiofire® FilmArray®Multiplex PCRPneumoniaSyndromic tests

Identifiers

PMID32665030
PMCPMC7359443
OpenAlexW3042848979

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.