Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32664992›Full record

ArticleJournal of nanobiotechnology2020

Potential use of 3D-printed graphene oxide scaffold for construction of the cartilage layer.

Zhong Cheng, Li Xigong, Diao Weiyi, Hu Jingen, Wang Shuo, Lin Xiangjin, Wu Junsong

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nanobiotechnology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Graphene in 3D Bioprinting.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Zhong ChengDepartment of Orthopedic, First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Qingchun Road 79, Hangzhou, 310003, People's Republic of China.
Li XigongDepartment of Orthopedic, First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Qingchun Road 79, Hangzhou, 310003, People's Republic of China.
Diao WeiyiThe Sport Medicine Center of the First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Qingchun Road 79, Hangzhou, 310003, People's Republic of China.
Hu JingenDepartment of Orthopedic, First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Qingchun Road 79, Hangzhou, 310003, People's Republic of China.
Wang ShuoDepartment of Orthopedic, First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Qingchun Road 79, Hangzhou, 310003, People's Republic of China.
Lin XiangjinThe Sport Medicine Center of the First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Qingchun Road 79, Hangzhou, 310003, People's Republic of China.
Wu JunsongDepartment of Orthopedic, First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Qingchun Road 79, Hangzhou, 310003, People's Republic of China. wjs1288@zju.edu.cn.
Zhejiang University · CN

Funding

Natural Science Foundation of China 81902225Zhejiang Medical and Health Science and Technology Project 2019KY384Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China LQ18H060002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThree-dimensional (3D) printing involves the layering of seed cells, biologically compatible scaffolds, and biological activity factors to precisely recapitulate a biological tissue. Graphene oxide (GO), a type of micro material, has been utilized as a small molecule-transport vehicle. With the proliferation of GO, the biocompatibility of chondrocytes in a microenvironment constructed by 3D printed scaffolds and GO is innovative. Accordingly, we speculate that, as a type of micro material, GO can be used with 3D scaffolds for a uniform distribution in the cartilage layer.

resultsA qualitative analysis of the chondrocyte-proliferation potential revealed that the culture of 3D printing with a 10% GO scaffold was higher than that of the other groups. Meanwhile, the progress of cell apoptosis was activated. Through scanning electron microscopy, immunofluorescence, and in vivo research, we observed that the newborn cartilage matrix extended along the border of the cartilage and scaffold and matured. After an analysis with immunohistochemical staining with aggrecan and collagen I, the cartilage following the 3D-printed scaffold was thinner than that of the 3D-printed GO scaffold. Furthermore, the collagen I of the cartilage expression in treatment with the GO scaffold was significant from week 2 to 6.

conclusionsThe findings indicate that a 3D-printed GO scaffold can potentially be utilized for the construction of a cartilage matrix. However, the optimum concentration of GO requires further research and discussion.

Indexed as

Printing, Three-DimensionalAnimalsCartilageCell LineChondrocytesGraphiteRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyTissue EngineeringTissue Scaffoldsgraphene oxideGraphite3D printingCartilageChondrocytesGraphene oxide

Identifiers

PMID32664992
PMCPMC7362511
OpenAlexW3043381973

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.