Observational studyJournal of cardiothoracic surgery2020
Risk factors for postoperative delirium in patients with triple-branched stent graft implantation.
Observational study in Journal of cardiothoracic surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Risk factors for postoperative delirium in patients with Stanford type A aortic dissection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2024Pooled it
- Predisposing and Precipitating Factors Associated With Delirium: A Systematic Review.JAMA network open · 2023Pooled it
- Comparative effectiveness and safety of open triple-branched stent graft technique with stented elephant trunk implantation in treating Stanford type A aortic dissection: A trial sequential meta-analysis.Journal of cardiac surgery · 2022Pooled it
- Outcomes of postoperative delirium in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Pooled it
- Development and validation of a nomogram-based risk prediction model for postoperative delirium in patients with stanford type A aortic dissection.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2026Observational
- The effect of enhanced recovery after surgery on postoperative delirium in surgical patients: a meta-analysis.Annals of surgical treatment and research · 2025Article
- A correlational study of plasma galectin-3 as a potential predictive marker of postoperative delirium in patients with acute aortic dissection.Scientific reports · 2025Observational
- Evaluation of postoperative delirium in cardiac surgery patients with the SDACS screening tool: a multicenter-multiphase study.Perioperative medicine (London, England) · 2025Article
- Practical prognostic tools to predict the risk of postoperative delirium in older patients undergoing cardiac surgery: visual and dynamic nomograms.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2025Article
- A nomogram model for assessing predictors and prognosis of postoperative delirium in patients receiving acute type A aortic dissection surgery.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2023Article
- Thyroid hormone, cortisol, interleukin-2, and procalcitonin regulate postoperative delirium in acute type A aortic dissection patients.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2022Article
- Can really plasma interleukin-6 predict postoperative delirium among patients undergoing open repair surgery of acute type A aortic dissection?Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2022Article
- Development and validation of a nomogram to predict postoperative delirium in type B aortic dissection patients underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair.Frontiers in surgery · 2022Article
- The role of inflammatory parameters in the prediction of postoperative delirium in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting.Cardiovascular journal of AfricaArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNeurological complications is a common complication following novel triple-branched stent graft implantation in patients with Stanford type A aortic dissection (AAD). But the incidence and risk factors of postoperative delirium (POD) are not completely clear. The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence and risk factors of POD after novel triple-branched stent graft implantation.
methodsAn observational study of AAD patients who underwent novel triple-branched stent graft implantation between January 2017 and July 2019 were followed up after surgery. Patients' delirium was screened by the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale and the Confusion Assessment Method for the intensive care unit from the first day after the operation, lasted 5 days. The risk factors of POD were analyzed by the Cox proportional hazard models.
resultsA total of 280 AAD patients were enrolled in this research, the incidence of POD was 37.86%. Adjusting for age, body mass index, and mechanical ventilation duration, multivariate Cox regression analysis model revealed that non-manual work (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR] = .554; 95% CI: 0.335-0.915; P = .021), Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE-II) scores > 20 (AHR = 3.359, 95% CI: 1.707-6.609, P < .001), hypoxemia (AHR = 1.846, 95% CI: 1.118-3.048, P = .017), and more than two types of analgesics and sedatives were independently associated with POD.
conclusionsThis study showed that risk factors independently associated with POD were APACHE-II score > 20, hypoxemia, and more types of analgesics and sedatives, and non-manual work was the protective factor.
trial registrationThis study was retrospectively registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (Registration number: ChiCTR1900022408 ; Date: 2019/4/10).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.