Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32664868›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2020

Development and validation of a predictive model for estimating EGFR mutation probabilities in patients with non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer in New Zealand.

Phyu Sin Aye, Sandar Tin Tin, Mark James McKeage, Prashannata Khwaounjoo, Alana Cavadino, J Mark Elwood

Open access · goldAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Detection ofTranslational cancer research · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Testing forOncoTargets and therapy · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Phyu Sin AyeEpidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Auckland, B507, 22-30 Park Ave, Grafton, Auckland, 1072, New Zealand. p.aye@auckland.ac.nz.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9356-9965
Sandar Tin TinEpidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Auckland, B507, 22-30 Park Ave, Grafton, Auckland, 1072, New Zealand.
Mark James McKeagePharmacology and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Prashannata KhwaounjooPharmacology and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Alana CavadinoEpidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Auckland, B507, 22-30 Park Ave, Grafton, Auckland, 1072, New Zealand.
J Mark ElwoodEpidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Auckland, B507, 22-30 Park Ave, Grafton, Auckland, 1072, New Zealand.
University of Auckland · NZ

Funding

Health Research Council, New Zealand 13-981 and 15-087
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTargeted treatment with Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) is superior to systemic chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with EGFR gene mutations. Detection of EGFR mutations is a challenge in many patients due to the lack of suitable tumour specimens for molecular testing or for other reasons. EGFR mutations are more common in female, Asian and never smoking NSCLC patients.

methodsPatients were from a population-based retrospective cohort of 3556 patients diagnosed with non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer in northern New Zealand between 1 Feb 2010 and 31 July 2017. A total of 1694 patients were tested for EGFR mutations, of which information on 1665 patients was available for model development and validation. A multivariable logistic regression model was developed based on 1176 tested patients, and validated in 489 tested patients. Among 1862 patients not tested for EGFR mutations, 129 patients were treated with EGFR-TKIs. Their EGFR mutation probabilities were calculated using the model, and their duration of benefit and overall survival from the start of EGFR-TKI were compared among the three predicted probability groups: < 0.2, 0.2-0.6, and > 0.6.

resultsThe model has three predictors: sex, ethnicity and smoking status, and is presented as a nomogram to calculate EGFR mutation probabilities. The model performed well in the validation group (AUC = 0.75). The probability cut-point of 0.2 corresponds 68% sensitivity and 78% specificity. The model predictions were related to outcome in a group of TKI-treated patients with no biopsy testing available (n = 129); in subgroups with predicted probabilities of < 0.2, 0.2-0.6, and > 0.6, median overall survival times from starting EGFR-TKI were 4.0, 5.5 and 18.3 months (p = 0.02); and median times remaining on EGFR-TKI treatment were 2.0, 4.2, and 14.0 months, respectively (p < 0.001).

conclusionOur model may assist clinical decision making for patients in whom tissue-based mutation testing is difficult or as a supplement to mutation testing.

Indexed as

Models, StatisticalMutationAdenocarcinoma of LungAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungDNA Mutational AnalysisErbB ReceptorsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedBiomarkers, TumorEGFR protein, humanErbB ReceptorsProtein Kinase InhibitorsEpidermal growth factor receptorLung CancerMutationNon-small-cell lung carcinomaPredictive modelsTargeted therapy

Identifiers

PMID32664868
PMCPMC7362551
OpenAlexW3042556268

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.