Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32664582›Full record

ArticleMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Fabrication and Plasma Surface Activation of Aligned Electrospun PLGA Fiber Fleeces with Improved Adhesion and Infiltration of Amniotic Epithelial Stem Cells Maintaining their Teno-inductive Potential.

Mohammad El Khatib, Annunziata Mauro, Ralf Wyrwa, Miriam Di Mattia, Maura Turriani, Oriana Di Giacinto, Björn Kretzschmar, Thomas Seemann, Luca Valbonetti, Paolo Berardinelli and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Mechanobiological Strategies to Enhance Ovine (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Recent advances in tendon tissue engineering strategy.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. In Vitro Innovation of Tendon Tissue Engineering Strategies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Mohammad El KhatibUnit of Basic and Applied Biosciences, Faculty of Bioscience and Agro-Food and Environmental Technology, University of Teramo, 64100 Teramo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0976-2522
Annunziata MauroUnit of Basic and Applied Biosciences, Faculty of Bioscience and Agro-Food and Environmental Technology, University of Teramo, 64100 Teramo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3907-0244
Ralf WyrwaDepartment of Biomaterials, INNOVENT e. V., 07745 Jena, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4556-6510
Miriam Di MattiaUnit of Basic and Applied Biosciences, Faculty of Bioscience and Agro-Food and Environmental Technology, University of Teramo, 64100 Teramo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2346-1064
Maura TurrianiUnit of Basic and Applied Biosciences, Faculty of Bioscience and Agro-Food and Environmental Technology, University of Teramo, 64100 Teramo, Italy.
Oriana Di GiacintoUnit of Basic and Applied Biosciences, Faculty of Bioscience and Agro-Food and Environmental Technology, University of Teramo, 64100 Teramo, Italy.
Björn KretzschmarDepartment of Surface Engineering, INNOVENT e. V., 07745 Jena, Germany.
Thomas SeemannDepartment of Surface Engineering, INNOVENT e. V., 07745 Jena, Germany.
Luca ValbonettiUnit of Basic and Applied Biosciences, Faculty of Bioscience and Agro-Food and Environmental Technology, University of Teramo, 64100 Teramo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5914-615X
Paolo BerardinelliUnit of Basic and Applied Biosciences, Faculty of Bioscience and Agro-Food and Environmental Technology, University of Teramo, 64100 Teramo, Italy.
Matthias SchnabelrauchDepartment of Biomaterials, INNOVENT e. V., 07745 Jena, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1968-8058
Barbara BarboniUnit of Basic and Applied Biosciences, Faculty of Bioscience and Agro-Food and Environmental Technology, University of Teramo, 64100 Teramo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0231-8066
Valentina RussoUnit of Basic and Applied Biosciences, Faculty of Bioscience and Agro-Food and Environmental Technology, University of Teramo, 64100 Teramo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4368-2534
University of Teramo · ITInnovent · DE

Funding

Ministero dell'Istruzione, dell'Università e della Ricerca C42F16000350001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electrospun PLGA microfibers with adequate intrinsic physical features (fiber alignment and diameter) have been shown to boost teno-differentiation and may represent a promising solution for tendon tissue engineering. However, the hydrophobic properties of PLGA may be adjusted through specific treatments to improve cell biodisponibility. In this study, electrospun PLGA with highly aligned microfibers were cold atmospheric plasma (CAP)-treated by varying the treatment exposure time (30, 60, and 90 s) and the working distance (1.3 and 1.7 cm) and characterized by their physicochemical, mechanical and bioactive properties on ovine amniotic epithelial cells (oAECs). CAP improved the hydrophilic properties of the treated materials due to the incorporation of new oxygen polar functionalities on the microfibers' surface especially when increasing treatment exposure time and lowering working distance. The mechanical properties, though, were affected by the treatment exposure time where the optimum performance was obtained after 60 s. Furthermore, CAP treatment did not alter oAECs' biocompatibility and improved cell adhesion and infiltration onto the microfibers especially those treated from a distance of 1.3 cm. Moreover, teno-inductive potential of highly aligned PLGA electrospun microfibers was maintained. Indeed, cells cultured onto the untreated and CAP treated microfibers differentiated towards the tenogenic lineage expressing tenomodulin, a mature tendon marker, in their cytoplasm. In conclusion, CAP treatment on PLGA microfibers conducted at 1.3 cm working distance represent the optimum conditions to activate PLGA surface by improving their hydrophilicity and cell bio-responsiveness. Since for tendon tissue engineering purposes, both high cell adhesion and mechanical parameters are crucial, PLGA treated for 60 s at 1.3 cm was identified as the optimal construct.

Indexed as

Biocompatible MaterialsTissue EngineeringAmnionAnimalsCell AdhesionCell DifferentiationCells, CulturedEpithelial CellsHydrophobic and Hydrophilic InteractionsMechanical PhenomenaPolylactic Acid-Polyglycolic Acid CopolymerSheepStem CellsTissue ScaffoldsBiocompatible MaterialsPolylactic Acid-Polyglycolic Acid Copolymeraligned microfibersamniotic epithelial stem cellscold atmospheric plasmaelectrospinningexposure timePLGAtendon tissue engineeringworking distance

Identifiers

PMID32664582
PMCPMC7396982
OpenAlexW3041950641

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.