Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32664458›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020

The Use of Partial Least Squares-Path Modelling to Understand the Impact of Ambivalent Sexism on Violence-Justification among Adolescents.

Roberto Fasanelli, Ida Galli, Maria Gabriella Grassia, Marina Marino, Rosanna Cataldo, Carlo Natale Lauro, Chiara Castiello, Filomena Grassia, Caterina Arcidiacono, Fortuna Procentese

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Downside: The Perpetrator of Violence in the Representations of Social and Health Professionals.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Roberto FasanelliDepartment of Social Science, University of Naples "Federico II", 80138 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8908-3284
Ida GalliDepartment of Social Science, University of Naples "Federico II", 80138 Naples, Italy.
Maria Gabriella GrassiaDepartment of Social Science, University of Naples "Federico II", 80138 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7128-7323
Marina MarinoDepartment of Social Science, University of Naples "Federico II", 80138 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0742-5912
Rosanna CataldoDepartment of Social Science, University of Naples "Federico II", 80138 Naples, Italy.
Carlo Natale LauroDepartment of Economics and Statistics, University of Naples "Federico II", 80126 Naples, Italy.
Chiara CastielloInstitute for Socio-Psychological Training, Research and Sexual Education, 80127 Naples, Italy.
Filomena GrassiaIstituto Nazionale di Statistica, 00184 Rome, Italy.
Caterina ArcidiaconoDepartment of Humanities, University of Naples "Federico II", 80138 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3699-6981
Fortuna ProcenteseDepartment of Humanities, University of Naples "Federico II", 80138 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1617-0165

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gender violence is generally conceived as a phenomenon concerning only adults. Nonetheless, it is also perpetrated within teenagers' relationships, as many empirical studies have shown. We therefore have focused our attention on a non-probabilistic sample consisting of 400 adolescents living in Naples (Italy), to study the association between sexism and the justification of violent attitudes. Generally, sexism is recognised as a discriminatory attitude towards people, based on their biological sex. However, it is conventional to talk about sexism as a prejudice against women. The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory (ASI) for adolescents was used to evaluate the two dimensions of ambivalent sexism, i.e., hostile sexism (HS) and benevolent sexism (BS). Moreover, the questionnaire regarding attitudes towards diversity and violence (CADV) was administered to assess participants' attitudes towards violence. A Partial Least Square-Second Order Path Model reveals that girls' ambivalent sexism is affected more by benevolent sexism than hostile sexism. On the contrary, among boys, hostile sexism has a higher impact. Finally, benevolent sexist girls justify domestic violence more than boys do.

Indexed as

Adolescent BehaviorHostilitySexismViolenceAdolescentAttitudeFemaleHumansItalyLeast-Squares AnalysisMaleadolescentsPartial Least Squares–Path Modellingsexismviolence legitimation

Identifiers

PMID32664458
PMCPMC7400311

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.