ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2020
Diagnostic Ability of Structural Transcranial Sonography in Patients with Alzheimer's Disease.
Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- State-of-the-Art Transcranial Sonography for Neuropsychiatric and Dementia Disorders: A Narrative Review.Cureus · 2025Review
- Imaging Methods Applicable in the Diagnostics of Alzheimer's Disease, Considering the Involvement of Insulin Resistance.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic ability of transcranial sonography (TCS) for the evaluation of the medial temporal lobe (MTL) in Alzheimer's disease (AD). Standard neuropsychological evaluation, TCS and 1.5 T MRI were performed for 20 patients with AD and for 20 age- and sex-matched healthy controls in a prospective manner. Measurements of the size of the third ventricle and heights of the MTL (A) and the choroidal fissure (B) were performed twice on each side by two independent neurosonologists for all participants. On MRI, both conventional and volumetric analyses of the third ventricle and hippocampus were performed. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves analyses were applied. Height of the MTL on TCS had sensitivities of 73.7% (right)/63.2%(left) and specificities of 65% (right)/65-70% (left) Area under a curve (AUC) 75.4-77.2% (right), 60.4-67.8% (left)) for AD. A/B ratio on TCS had sensitivities of 73.7% (right)/57.9% (left) and specificities of 70.0% (right)/55.0% (left) (AUC 73.3% (right), 60.4% (left)) by the experienced neurosonologist, and sensitivities of 78.9% (right and left) and specificities of 60.0% (right)/65.0% (left) (AUC 77.8-80.0%) by the inexperienced neurosonologist for AD. On MRI, linear measurement of the hippocampus and parahippocampal gyrus height had sensitivities of 84.2% (right)/89.5% (left) and specificities of 80.0% (right)/85% (left) (AUC 86.1-92.9%) for AD. Hippocampal volume had sensitivities of 70% (right and left) and specificities of 75% (right)/80% (left) (AUC 77.5-78%) for AD. Atrophy of the right MTL in AD could be detected on TCS with a good diagnostic ability, however MRI performed better on the left.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.