Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32664402›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2020

Preserved Capacity for Adaptations in Strength and Muscle Regulatory Factors in Elderly in Response to Resistance Exercise Training and Deconditioning.

Andreas Mæchel Fritzen, Frank D Thøgersen, Khaled Abdul Nasser Qadri, Thomas Krag, Marie-Louise Sveen, John Vissing, Tina D Jeppesen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. MicroRNAs as the Sentinels of Redox and Hypertrophic Signalling.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Strength training in elderly: An useful tool against sarcopenia.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Andreas Mæchel FritzenDepartment of Neurology, Copenhagen Neuromuscular Center, Rigshospitalet, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-8793-9739
Frank D ThøgersenDepartment of Neurology, Copenhagen Neuromuscular Center, Rigshospitalet, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Khaled Abdul Nasser QadriDepartment of Neurology, Copenhagen Neuromuscular Center, Rigshospitalet, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Thomas KragDepartment of Neurology, Copenhagen Neuromuscular Center, Rigshospitalet, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-9330-668X
Marie-Louise SveenDepartment of Neurology, Copenhagen Neuromuscular Center, Rigshospitalet, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
John VissingDepartment of Neurology, Copenhagen Neuromuscular Center, Rigshospitalet, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Tina D JeppesenDepartment of Neurology, Copenhagen Neuromuscular Center, Rigshospitalet, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Rigshospitalet · DKNovo Nordisk (Denmark) · DKUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

Alfred Benzon Foundation NADanish Diabetes Academy NNF17SA0031406
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aging is related to an inevitable loss of muscle mass and strength. The mechanisms behind age-related loss of muscle tissue are not fully understood but may, among other things, be induced by age-related differences in myogenic regulatory factors. Resistance exercise training and deconditioning offers a model to investigate differences in myogenic regulatory factors that may be important for age-related loss of muscle mass and strength. Nine elderly (82 ± 7 years old) and nine young, healthy persons (22 ± 2 years old) participated in the study. Exercise consisted of six weeks of resistance training of the quadriceps muscle followed by eight weeks of deconditioning. Muscle biopsy samples before and after training and during the deconditioning period were analyzed for MyoD, myogenin, insulin-like growth-factor I receptor, activin receptor IIB, smad2, porin, and citrate synthase. Muscle strength improved with resistance training by 78% (95.0 ± 22.0 kg) in the elderly to a similar extent as in the young participants (83.5%; 178.2 ± 44.2 kg) and returned to baseline in both groups after eight weeks of deconditioning. No difference was seen in expression of muscle regulatory factors between elderly and young in response to exercise training and deconditioning. In conclusion, the capacity to gain muscle strength with resistance exercise training in elderly was not impaired, highlighting this as a potent tool to combat age-related loss of muscle function, possibly due to preserved regulation of myogenic factors in elderly compared with young muscle.

Indexed as

deconditioningelderlyhypertrophymuscle regulatory factorsmuscle strengthresistance exercise trainingsarcopeniaskeletal muscle

Identifiers

PMID32664402
PMCPMC7408999
OpenAlexW3040759906

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.