Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32664393›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2020

Hybrid Polyetheretherketone (PEEK)-Acrylic Resin Prostheses and the All-on-4 Concept: A Full-Arch Implant-Supported Fixed Solution with 3 Years of Follow-Up.

Miguel de Araújo Nobre, Carlos Moura Guedes, Ricardo Almeida, António Silva, Nuno Sereno

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07475507 (Effect of PEEK and Titanium Framework Reinforcement on Marginal Bone Loss Around Implants Supporting a Fixed All-on-four Prosthesis in Completely Edentulous Mandibles. A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07475507 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Effect of PEEK and Titanium Framework Reinforcement on Marginal Bone Loss Around Implants Supporting a Fixed All-on-four Prosthesis in Completely Edentulous Mandibles. A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorCairo UniversityRan2024 to 2027Enrolled20ConditionsProsthodontics, Implants, Dental, Prosthesis, Bone Loss, AlveolarArmsTitanium framework reinforced all on four prosthesis, PEEK framework reinforced all on four prosthesis
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Miguel de Araújo NobreMALO CLINIC, Research and Development Department, Av. Combatentes, 43, 11, 1600-042 Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-7084-8301
Carlos Moura GuedesMALO CLINIC, Prosthodontics Department, Av. Combatentes, 43, 10, 1600-042 Lisbon, Portugal.
Ricardo AlmeidaMALO CLINIC, Prosthodontics Department, Av. Combatentes, 43, 10, 1600-042 Lisbon, Portugal.
António SilvaMALO CLINIC, Ceramics, Av. Combatentes, 43, 11, 1600-042 Lisbon, Portugal.
Nuno SerenoInvibio Biomaterial Solutions & JUVORA, Global Technology Center, Hillhouse International, Thornton, Cleveleys FY5 4QD, UK.
Hospital do Mar · PT

Funding

Juvora 1/2013
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of this three-year prospective study was to examine the outcome of a solution for full-arch rehabilitation through a fixed implant-supported hybrid prosthesis (polyetheretherketone (PEEK)-acrylic resin) used in conjunction with the All-on-4 concept.

methodsThirty-seven patients (29 females, 8 males), with an age range of 38 to 78 years (average: 59.8 years) were rehabilitated with 49 full-arch implant-supported prostheses (12 maxillary rehabilitations, 13 mandibular rehabilitations and 12 bimaxillary rehabilitations). The primary outcome measure was prosthetic survival. Secondary outcome measures were marginal bone loss, plaque and bleeding scores, veneer adhesion issues, biological complications, mechanical complications, and the patients' subjective evaluation.

resultsThere were two patients (maxillary rehabilitations) lost to follow-up, while one patient withdrew (maxillary rehabilitation). One patient with bimaxillary rehabilitation fractured the mandibular PEEK framework, rendering a 98% prosthetic survival rate. Implant survival was 100%. Average (standard deviation) marginal bone loss at 3-years was 0.40 mm (0.73 mm). Veneer adhesion was the only technical complication (

conclusionsBased on the results, the three-year outcome suggests the proposed rehabilitation solution as a legitimate treatment option, providing a potential shock-absorbing alternative that could benefit the implant biological outcome.

Indexed as

dental implantsimmediate dental implant loadingPEEKpolyetheretherketoneprostheses and implants

Identifiers

PMID32664393
PMCPMC7408851
OpenAlexW3040985743

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.