Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32664369›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020

Countering Vaccine Hesitancy among Pregnant Women in England: The Case of Boostrix-IPV.

Mairead Ryan, Laura A V Marlow, Alice Forster

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Global Systematic Scoping Review of Adolescent Factors Associated With COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy.The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mairead RyanDepartment of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8165-4978
Laura A V MarlowDepartment of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1709-2397
Alice ForsterDepartment of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9933-7919
University College London · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK C49896/A17429Cancer Research UK C7492/A17219
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study explored the effects of message framing on vaccine hesitancy for the antenatal whooping cough vaccine. The study also assessed whether the Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB) constructs had any explanatory utility for vaccine intentions and behaviours in pregnant women. A between-subjects, cross-sectional design was employed. Participants (

Indexed as

Diphtheria-Tetanus-Pertussis VaccineIntentionPregnant PeoplePsychological TheoryAdolescentAdultChildCross-Sectional StudiesEnglandFemaleHumansPregnancySurveys and QuestionnairesVaccination RefusalYoung AdultBoostrixDiphtheria-Tetanus-Pertussis Vaccinemessage framing, theory of planned behaviourvaccine hesitancywhooping cough

Identifiers

PMID32664369
PMCPMC7400283
OpenAlexW3041814952

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.