Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32664325›Full record

ReviewMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Potential Toxicity of Iron Oxide Magnetic Nanoparticles: A Review.

Nemi Malhotra, Jiann-Shing Lee, Rhenz Alfred D Liman, Johnsy Margotte S Ruallo, Oliver B Villaflores, Tzong-Rong Ger, Chung-Der Hsiao

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 150 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
150citing papers in PubMed
17.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

150 citing papers in PubMed, 440 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Long-Term Biodistribution of FeInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. In Vitro Antitumor Effects of Melittin Attached to FeMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Magnetic nanoparticles for cancer theranostics.Biomedical physics & engineering express · 2026
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

90 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Nemi MalhotraDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Chung Yuan Christian University, Chung-Li 32023, Taiwan.
Jiann-Shing LeeDepartment of Applied Physics, National Pingtung University, Pingtung 90007, Taiwan.
Rhenz Alfred D LimanThe Graduate School, University of Santo Tomas, Manila 1015, Philippines.
Johnsy Margotte S RualloThe Graduate School, University of Santo Tomas, Manila 1015, Philippines.
Oliver B VillafloresDepartment of Biochemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy and Research Center for Natural and Applied Sciences, University of Santo Tomas, Manila 1015, Philippines.
Tzong-Rong GerDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Chung Yuan Christian University, Chung-Li 32023, Taiwan.
Chung-Der HsiaoDepartment of Bioscience Technology, Chung Yuan Christian University, Chung-Li 32023, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-6398-8672
Chung Yuan Christian University · TWUniversity of Santo Tomas · PHNational Pingtung University · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The noteworthy intensification in the development of nanotechnology has led to the development of various types of nanoparticles. The diverse applications of these nanoparticles make them desirable candidate for areas such as drug delivery, coasmetics, medicine, electronics, and contrast agents for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and so on. Iron oxide magnetic nanoparticles are a branch of nanoparticles which is specifically being considered as a contrast agent for MRI as well as targeted drug delivery vehicles, angiogenic therapy and chemotherapy as small size gives them advantage to travel intravascular or intracavity actively for drug delivery. Besides the mentioned advantages, the toxicity of the iron oxide magnetic nanoparticles is still less explored. For in vivo applications magnetic nanoparticles should be nontoxic and compatible with the body fluids. These particles tend to degrade in the body hence there is a need to understand the toxicity of the particles as whole and degraded products interacting within the body. Some nanoparticles have demonstrated toxic effects such inflammation, ulceration, and decreases in growth rate, decline in viability and triggering of neurobehavioral alterations in plants and cell lines as well as in animal models. The cause of nanoparticles' toxicity is attributed to their specific characteristics of great surface to volume ratio, chemical composition, size, and dosage, retention in body, immunogenicity, organ specific toxicity, breakdown and elimination from the body. In the current review paper, we aim to sum up the current knowledge on the toxic effects of different magnetic nanoparticles on cell lines, marine organisms and rodents. We believe that the comprehensive data can provide significant study parameters and recent developments in the field. Thereafter, collecting profound knowledge on the background of the subject matter, will contribute to drive research in this field in a new sustainable direction.

Indexed as

AnimalsDrug Delivery SystemsFerric CompoundsHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMagnetite NanoparticlesParticle SizeFerric Compoundsferric oxideMagnetite Nanoparticlesaquatic organismcellmagnetic nanoparticlerodenttoxicity

Identifiers

PMID32664325
PMCPMC7397295
OpenAlexW3040895241

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.