ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2020
Correlation of the Subjective Hip Value with Validated Patient-Reported Outcome Measurements for the Hip.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Return to work after periacetabular osteotomy: workload as a determinant of occupational trajectories.Bone & joint open · 2026Article
- Natural History of Nonoperatively Treated Borderline Acetabular Dysplasia in Young Adults and Factors Associated With Inferior Functional Outcome.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2026Article
- Validation of the subjective spine value in patients with adult idiopathic scoliosis.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2025Article
- Emerging concepts and challenges in the development of disease-modifying osteoarthritis drugs - a more refined perspective.Archives of pharmacal research · 2025Review
- The subjective hip value: a retrospective validation study in primary total hip arthroplasty.Arthroplasty (London, England) · 2025Article
- From mobility to intimacy: assessing the effects of periacetabular osteotomy on sexual function in patients with hip dysplasia.Bone & joint open · 2025Article
- Periacetabular osteotomy for symptomatic hip dysplasia in middle aged patients: does age alone matter?Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2024Article
- Outcomes and Return-to-Sports Rates in Patients With Borderline Hip Dysplasia After Periacetabular Osteotomy: A Case Series With 5-Year Follow-up.The American journal of sports medicine · 2024Article
- Validation of the Subjective Spine Value: A new single item score for the assessment of spine-specific function.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2023Article
- Net Promoter Score: a prospective, single-centre observational study assessing if a single question determined treatment success after primary or revision hip arthroplasty.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2023Observational
- Periacetabular Osteotomy with a Modified Fixation Technique Using K-Wires Shows Clinical Results Comparable to Screw Fixation at Mid-Term Follow-Up.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- The influence of lumbo-sacral transitional vertebrae in developmental dysplasia of the hip: a matched pair analysis.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Changes in Sports Activity After Periacetabular Osteotomy: A Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis.The American journal of sports medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe subjective hip value (SHV) was developed as a patient-reported outcome measurement (PROM) that is easily and quickly performed and interpreted. The SHV is defined as a patient's subjective hip measurement tool expressed as a percentage of an entirely normal hip joint, which would score 100%. The hypothesis is that results of the subjective hip value correlate with the results of the modified Harris hip score and the International Hip Outcome Tool in patients with hip-related diseases.
methods302 patients completed the modified Harris hip score (mHHS), the International Hip Outcome Tool (iHot-33) as well as the SHV. The SHV consist of only one question: "What is the overall percent value of your hip if a completely normal hip represents 100%?". The patients were divided into five different groups depending on the diagnosis. Pearson correlation was used to evaluate the correlation between the different PROMs and linear regression analysis was used to calculate R
results302 complete datasets were available for evaluation. There was a high correlation between the SHV and the iHOT-33 (
conclusionThe SHV offers a useful adjunct to established hip outcome measurements, as it is easily and quickly performed and interpreted. The SHV reflects the view of the patient and is independent of the diagnosis. Further research with prospective studies is needed to test the psychometric properties of the score.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.