Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32664200›Full record

ArticleCancers2020

Precision Science on Incidence and Progression of Early-Detected Small Breast Invasive Cancers by Mammographic Features.

Rene Wei-Jung Chang, Shu-Lin Chuang, Chen-Yang Hsu, Amy Ming-Fang Yen, Wendy Yi-Ying Wu, Sam Li-Sheng Chen, Jean Ching-Yuan Fann, Laszlo Tabar, Robert A Smith, Stephen W Duffy and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Rene Wei-Jung ChangInstitute of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei City 100, Taiwan.
Shu-Lin ChuangDepartment of Medical Research, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei City 100, Taiwan.
Chen-Yang HsuInstitute of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei City 100, Taiwan.
Amy Ming-Fang YenSchool of Oral Hygiene, College of Oral Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei City 110, Taiwan.
Wendy Yi-Ying WuDepartment of Radiation Sciences, Oncology, Umeå University, 90187 Umeå, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-6169-5155
Sam Li-Sheng ChenSchool of Oral Hygiene, College of Oral Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei City 110, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0001-9750-3015
Jean Ching-Yuan FannDepartment of Health Industry Management, College of Healthcare Management, Kainan University, Taoyuan City 338, Taiwan.
Laszlo TabarDepartment of Mammography, Falun Central Hospital, 791823 Falun, Sweden.
Robert A SmithCenter for Cancer Screening, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA 30303, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3344-2238
Stephen W DuffyCentre for Cancer Prevention, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square, London EC1M 6BQ, UK.
Sherry Yueh-Hsia ChiuDepartment of Health Care Management, College of Management, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan City 333, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-7207-7088
Hsiu-Hsi ChenInstitute of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei City 100, Taiwan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim was to evaluate how the inter-screening interval affected the performance of screening by mammographic appearances. This was a Swedish retrospective screening cohort study with information on screening history and mammography features in two periods (1977-1985 and 1996-2010). The pre-clinical incidence and the mean sojourn time (MST) for small breast cancer allowing for sensitivity by mammographic appearances were estimated. The percentage of interval cancer against background incidence (I/E ratio) was used to assess the performance of mammography screening by different inter-screening intervals. The sensitivity-adjusted MSTs (in years) were heterogeneous with mammographic features, being longer for powdery and crushed stone-like calcifications (4.26, (95% CI, 3.50-5.26)) and stellate masses (3.76, (95% CI, 3.15-4.53)) but shorter for circular masses (2.65, (95% CI, 2.06-3.55)) in 1996-2010. The similar trends, albeit longer MSTs, were also noted in 1977-1985. The I/E ratios for the stellate type were 23% and 32% for biennial and triennial screening, respectively. The corresponding figures were 32% and 43% for the circular type and 21% and 29% for powdery and crushed stone-like calcifications, respectively. Mammography-featured progressions of small invasive breast cancer provides a new insight into personalized quality assurance, surveillance, treatment and therapy of early-detected breast cancer.

Indexed as

breast cancerinterval cancermammographysensitivitysojourn time

Identifiers

PMID32664200
PMCPMC7408735

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.