Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32664127›Full record

Trial reportMedicine2020

Novel airway device Vie Scope in several pediatric airway scenario: A randomized simulation pilot trial.

Maciej Maslanka, Lukasz Szarpak, Sanchit Ahuja, Kurt Ruetzler, Jacek Smereka

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Vie Scope® versus videolaryngoscopy in expected difficult airways: a randomized controlled trial.Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie · 2023
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Comparing devices for managing the difficult airway.Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie · 2024
    Article
  8. Simulation in airway management teaching and training.Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2024
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Maciej MaslankaMedical Institute of Maria Sklodowska-Curie.
Lukasz SzarpakComprehensive Cancer Center in Bialystok, Bialystok, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-0973-5455
Sanchit AhujaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Pain Management and Perioperative Medicine, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI.
Kurt RuetzlerDepartments of Outcomes Research and General Anesthesiology, Anesthesiology Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.
Jacek SmerekaDepartment of Emergency Medical Service, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland.
Cleveland Clinic · USHenry Ford Health System · USS.P.E.C.I.E.S. · USWroclaw Medical University · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextEndotracheal intubation of pediatric patients is challenging, especially in the pre-hospital emergency setting and if performed by less experienced providers. Securing an airway should be achieved with a single intubation attempt, as each intubation attempt contributes to morbidity and mortality. A new airway device, the VieScope, was recently introduced into clinical market, but efficacy to reduced intubation attempts remains unclear thus far.

objectiveWe aimed to compare endotracheal intubation by paramedics using the Vie Scope in different pediatric airway simulation conditions.

methodsWe conducted a randomized, cross-over simulation study. Following a theoretical and practical training session, paramedics performed endotracheal intubation in 3 different pediatric emergency scenarios: normal airway; tongue edema; cardiopulmonary resuscitation using the VieScope. Overall intubation success rate was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included number of intubation attempts, time to intubation, Cormack-Lehane grade, POGO score, and ease of use (using 1-100 scale).

resultsFifty-five paramedics with at least 2 years of clinical experience and without any previous experience with the VieScope participated in this study. The overall intubation success rate was 100% in all 3 scenarios. The median intubation time was 27 (24-34) versus 27 (25-37) versus 29 (25-40) s for scenarios A, B, and C, respectively. In scenario A, all paramedics performed successful intubation with 1 single intubation attempt, whereas 2% of the paramedics had to perform 2 intubation attempts in scenario B and 9% in scenario C.

conclusionsResults of this simulation study indicate preliminary evidence, that the VieScope enables adequate endotracheal intubation in the pediatric setting. Further clinical studies are needed to confirm these results.

Indexed as

Allied Health PersonnelLaryngoscopesCardiopulmonary ResuscitationCross-Over StudiesEquipment DesignFemaleHumansIntubation, IntratrachealMaleManikinsPediatricsPilot Projects

Identifiers

PMID32664127
PMCPMC7360210
OpenAlexW3041234097

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.