ArticleMedicine2020
Efficacy and safety of dual filtration plasmapheresis combined with biological agents in active refractory rheumatod arthritis: A retrospective cohort study.
Article in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To investigate the effectiveness of dual filtration plasmapheresis (DFPP), a novel blood purification treatment, as a rapid and sustained disease-modifying therapy for active refractory rheumatoid arthritis (RA).A retrospective cohort study had been conducted. One hundred fifty three patients aged 18 years or older with active refractory RA were treated with DFPP combined with infliximab (IFX), IFX, or glucocorticoid (GC), all the above treatments were combined with methotrexate (MTX).Baseline characteristic of the 153 patients (DFPP: n = 53; IFX: n = 51; GC: n = 49) were similar across groups. The remission rate of CDAI (SDAI) in the DFPP treatment group was significantly higher than that of the IFX and GC group after 3 months of treatment. The remission rate of DFPP treatment group was above 50%, while in IFX and GC group, the rate of CDAI (SDAI) remission was 41.2% (37.3%) and 22.4% (14.2%) after 3 months of treatment.A combination of DFPP and biological agents can quickly induce remission or low disease activity of active refractory RA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.