Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32663692›Full record

ArticleThe Science of the total environment2020

Social and spatial distribution of soil lead concentrations in the City of Santa Ana, California: Implications for health inequities.

Shahir Masri, Alana LeBrón, Michael Logue, Enrique Valencia, Abel Ruiz, Abigail Reyes, Jean M Lawrence, Jun Wu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Science of the total environment, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Soil Lead (Pb) in New Orleans: A Spatiotemporal and Racial Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Shahir MasriProgram in Public Health, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697, USA. Electronic address: masris@uci.edu.
Alana LeBrónProgram in Public Health, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697, USA; Department of Chicano/Latino Studies, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697, USA.
Michael LogueProgram in Public Health, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697, USA.
Enrique ValenciaOrange County Environmental Justice, Santa Ana, CA 92705, USA.
Abel RuizJóvenes Cultivando Cambios, Santa Ana, CA 92705, USA.
Abigail ReyesCommunity Resilience, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697, USA.
Jean M LawrenceDepartment of Research & Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA 91101, USA.
Jun WuProgram in Public Health, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697, USA; Center for Occupational and Environmental Health, University of California, Irvine 92617, CA, USA. Electronic address: junwu@uci.edu.

Funding

University of California Health Participation in the National COVID Cohort Collaborative (N3C)UL1TR001414 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI COOPER, DAN M, VILAIN, ERIC J. · 2015 to 2023
$35.1M
Environmental and Social Health Determinants of Pregnancy Outcomes Related to COVID-19 PandemicR01ES030353 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI GETAHUN, DARIOS, WU, JUN · 2019 to 2022
$3.2M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001414NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES030353
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLead (Pb) exposure is a problem that disproportionately impacts low-income communities and communities of color. We applied a community-based participatory research approach to assess the distribution of soil Pb concentrations and related social vulnerabilities across Census tracts in Santa Ana, CA.

methodsSoil Pb samples (n = 1528) were collected by the ¡Plo-NO! Santa Ana! Lead-Free Santa Ana! partnership in 2018 across Santa Ana, CA, at a high spatial resolution and measured using XRF analysis. Pb concentrations were mapped and spatial interpolation was conducted to generate a continuous smoothed map of soil Pb concentrations across the city. American Community Survey data was used to examine Pb across Census tracts based on social and economic factors, and to allow for the development of a Cumulative Risk Index to identify areas at high risk of health impacts.

resultsSoil Pb concentrations varied by landuse type and socioeconomic factors. Census tracts with a median household income below $50,000 had over five times higher soil Pb concentrations than high-income Census tracts. Soil samples collected in tertiles with the highest percent children, residents without health insurance, renter-occupied housing units, and lowest percent college educated residents had 90.0%, 96.1%, 75.2%, and 87.0% higher Pb concentrations on average, respectively, compared to their counterparts. Overall, 52.7% of residential samples had Pb concentrations in excess of the 80 ppm California EPA recommendation, and 11 Census tracts were characterized as high risk according to our Cumulative Risk Index. DISCUSSION: This study underscores the need for precautionary measures relating to disturbances of the soil, particularly for areas where children play outside, given children's higher absorption of lead. It also informs environmental justice initiatives and identifies vulnerable subpopulations at greater risk of Pb exposure, thus warranting community-driven recommendations for policies and initiatives to remediate soil Pb and protect public health and health equity.

Indexed as

CaliforniaChildCitiesEnvironmental MonitoringHumansLeadSoilSoil PollutantsLeadSoilSoil PollutantsChildrenEnvironmental hazardsEnvironmental justicePb exposureRisk assessmentUrban soil

Identifiers

PMID32663692
PMCPMC7492407

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.