Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32663657›Full record

ArticleTranslational oncology2020

Breast lesion characterization using Quantitative Ultrasound (QUS) and derivative texture methods.

Laurentius O Osapoetra, Lakshmanan Sannachi, Daniel DiCenzo, Karina Quiaoit, Kashuf Fatima, Gregory J Czarnota

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Toward Real-Time Backscatter Coefficient Estimation Incorporating the U-Net Segmentation and an In Vivo Reference Target.Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Oncotarget · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Laurentius O OsapoetraPhysical Sciences, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada; Departments of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Lakshmanan SannachiPhysical Sciences, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada; Departments of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Daniel DiCenzoPhysical Sciences, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Karina QuiaoitPhysical Sciences, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Kashuf FatimaPhysical Sciences, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Gregory J CzarnotaPhysical Sciences, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada; Departments of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada; Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. Electronic address: gregory.czarnota@sunnybrook.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAccurate and timely diagnosis of breast cancer is extremely important because of its high incidence and high morbidity. Early diagnosis of breast cancer through screening can improve overall prognosis. Currently, biopsy remains as the gold standard for tumor pathological confirmation. Development of diagnostic imaging techniques for rapid and accurate characterization of breast lesions is required. We aim to evaluate the usefulness of texture-derivate features of QUS spectral parametric images for non-invasive characterization of breast lesions.

methodsQUS Spectroscopy was used to determine parametric images of mid-band fit (MBF), spectral slope (SS), spectral intercept (SI), average scatterer diameter (ASD), and average acoustic concentration (AAC) in 204 patients with suspicious breast lesions. Subsequently, texture analysis techniques were used to generate texture maps from parametric images to quantify heterogeneities of QUS parametric images. Further, a second-pass texture analysis was applied to obtain texture-derivate features. QUS parameters, texture-parameters and texture-derivate parameters were determined from both tumor core and a 5-mm tumor margin and were used in comparison to histopathological analysis in order to develop a diagnostic model for classifying breast lesions as either benign or malignant. Both leave-one-out and hold-out cross-validations were used to evaluate the performance of the diagnostic model. Three standard classification algorithms including a linear discriminant analysis (LDA), k-nearest neighbors (KNN), and support vector machines-radial basis function (SVM-RBF) were evaluated.

resultsCore and margin information using the SVM-RBF attained the best classification performance of 90% sensitivity, 92% specificity, 91% accuracy, and 0.93 AUC utilizing QUS parameters and their texture derivatives, evaluated using leave-one-out cross-validation. Implementation of hold-out cross-validation using combination of both core and margin information and SVM-RBF achieved average accuracy and AUC of 88% and 0.92, respectively.

conclusionsQUS-based framework and derivative texture methods enable accurate classification of breast lesions. Evaluation of the proposed technique on a large cohort using hold-out cross-validation demonstrates its robustness and its generalization.

Identifiers

PMID32663657
PMCPMC7358267

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.