ArticleTranslational oncology2020
Breast lesion characterization using Quantitative Ultrasound (QUS) and derivative texture methods.
Article in Translational oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comprehensive Radiomics Analysis to Enhance Breast Lesion Characterization Using QUS Spectral Parametric Imaging.Cancers · 2026Article
- Machine learning for the prediction of three-year survival in locally advanced breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy using quantitative ultrasound imaging.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Quantitative Ultrasound Texture Analysis of Breast Tumor Responses to Chemotherapy: Comparison of a Cart-Based and a Wireless Ultrasound Scanner.Journal of imaging · 2026Article
- AI-enabled RF data synthesis for breast ultrasound: efficacy in quantitative ultrasound tissue characterization.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Radiomics Analysis of QUS Spectral Parametric Images for Predicting the Risk of Breast Cancer Recurrence.Cancers · 2025Article
- The Role of Quantitative Ultrasound in Monitoring Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer: A Narrative Review.Cancers · 2025Review
- Toward Real-Time Backscatter Coefficient Estimation Incorporating the U-Net Segmentation and an In Vivo Reference Target.Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine · 2025Article
- Quantitative Volumetric Analysis Using 3D Ultrasound Tomography for Breast Mass Characterization.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2025Article
- End-to-end CNN-based deep learning enhances breast lesion characterization using quantitative ultrasound (QUS) spectral parametric images.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Deep learning and radiomics integration of photoacoustic/ultrasound imaging for non-invasive prediction of luminal and non-luminal breast cancer subtypes.Breast cancer research : BCR · 2025Article
- Homodyned K-Distribution Temporal-Based Characterization of Rat Placenta Microstructure Using the Reduced Uterine Perfusion Pressure Model of Preeclampsia.Ultrasound in medicine & biology · 2025Article
- Quantitative Ultrasound Texture Analysis of Breast Tumors: A Comparison of a Cart-Based and a Wireless Ultrasound Scanner.Journal of imaging · 2025Article
- Relationship between transmission/reception conditions of high-frequency plane wave compounding and evaluation accuracy of extended amplitude envelope statistics.Japanese journal of applied physics (2008) · 2024Article
- Quantitative US Delta Radiomics to Predict Radiation Response in Individuals with Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma.Radiology. Imaging cancer · 2024Observational
- Transfer learning of pre-treatment quantitative ultrasound multi-parametric images for the prediction of breast cancer response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Quantitative evaluation of rat sciatic nerve degeneration using high-frequency ultrasound.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- High-Resolution Ultrasound Characterization of Local Scattering in Cancer Tissue.Ultrasound in medicine & biology · 2023Article
- Texture quantified from ultrasound Nakagami parametric images is diagnostically relevant for breast tumor characterization.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2023Article
- Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeAccurate and timely diagnosis of breast cancer is extremely important because of its high incidence and high morbidity. Early diagnosis of breast cancer through screening can improve overall prognosis. Currently, biopsy remains as the gold standard for tumor pathological confirmation. Development of diagnostic imaging techniques for rapid and accurate characterization of breast lesions is required. We aim to evaluate the usefulness of texture-derivate features of QUS spectral parametric images for non-invasive characterization of breast lesions.
methodsQUS Spectroscopy was used to determine parametric images of mid-band fit (MBF), spectral slope (SS), spectral intercept (SI), average scatterer diameter (ASD), and average acoustic concentration (AAC) in 204 patients with suspicious breast lesions. Subsequently, texture analysis techniques were used to generate texture maps from parametric images to quantify heterogeneities of QUS parametric images. Further, a second-pass texture analysis was applied to obtain texture-derivate features. QUS parameters, texture-parameters and texture-derivate parameters were determined from both tumor core and a 5-mm tumor margin and were used in comparison to histopathological analysis in order to develop a diagnostic model for classifying breast lesions as either benign or malignant. Both leave-one-out and hold-out cross-validations were used to evaluate the performance of the diagnostic model. Three standard classification algorithms including a linear discriminant analysis (LDA), k-nearest neighbors (KNN), and support vector machines-radial basis function (SVM-RBF) were evaluated.
resultsCore and margin information using the SVM-RBF attained the best classification performance of 90% sensitivity, 92% specificity, 91% accuracy, and 0.93 AUC utilizing QUS parameters and their texture derivatives, evaluated using leave-one-out cross-validation. Implementation of hold-out cross-validation using combination of both core and margin information and SVM-RBF achieved average accuracy and AUC of 88% and 0.92, respectively.
conclusionsQUS-based framework and derivative texture methods enable accurate classification of breast lesions. Evaluation of the proposed technique on a large cohort using hold-out cross-validation demonstrates its robustness and its generalization.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.