ArticleMethods (San Diego, Calif.)2021
FreeHi-C spike-in simulations for benchmarking differential chromatin interaction detection.
Article in Methods (San Diego, Calif.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
High-throughput genome-wide chromatin conformation capture assay (Hi-C) is routinely used to profile long-range genomic interactions and three-dimensional organization of genomes. A key application of Hi-C is the comparative analysis of genomic interactions across different time points, cellular conditions, or multiple stimuli. While operating characteristics of methods for Hi-C data processing such as normalization, pairwise interaction and higher-order organization detection have been relatively well studied, properties of methods for differential chromatin interaction detection are less investigated. We have recently developed FreeHi-C to enable data-driven non-parametric simulations from Hi-C experiments. Here, we extend FreeHi-C with a user/data-driven spike-in module to facilitate comparisons of differential chromatin interaction detection methods where the ground truth differential chromatin interactions are known under a wide variety of settings. We use FreeHi-C to benchmark four differential chromatin interaction detection methods, namely HiCcompare, multiHiCcompare, diffHic, and Selfish, using three comparative analysis settings with different sequencing depths and spike-in proportions. This comparison reveals distinguished performances in terms of the standard metrics such as the false discovery rate control, detection power, significance order, precision-recall curve, and receiver operating characteristic curve as well as overall genomic properties of the types of differential chromatin interactions detectable by each method. Furthermore, it highlights the lack of power for all methods in small replication settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.