Developing a culture of stewardship: how to prevent the Tragedy of the Commons in universal health systems.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Criteria and enabling conditions for assessing cash-releasing interventions: An evidence review in the context of the NHS 'three shifts'.Future healthcare journal · 2026
   Review
2. What next for the Australian Atlas of Healthcare Variation series? Focusing the system on appropriate and sustainable health care.Research in health services & regions · 2024
   Review
3. The impact of cognitive biases, mental models, and mindsets on leadership and change in the health system.Healthcare management forum · 2024
   Article
4. COVID 19: questioning and change must be the new normal.Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine · 2020
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as