Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32663218›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Investigating the added value of biomarkers compared with self-reported smoking in predicting future e-cigarette use: Evidence from a longitudinal UK cohort study.

Jasmine N Khouja, Marcus R Munafò, Caroline L Relton, Amy E Taylor, Suzanne H Gage, Rebecca C Richmond

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Perceived Harm of Vaping Relative to Smoking and Associations With Subsequent Smoking and Vaping Behaviors Among Young Adults: Evidence From a UK Cohort Study.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Critical Challenges and Creative Solutions for Quantifying Nicotine Vaping: Qualitative Reports From Young Adults.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jasmine N KhoujaMRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit at the University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-7944-2981
Marcus R MunafòMRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit at the University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Caroline L ReltonMRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit at the University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Amy E TaylorBristol Medical School, Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Suzanne H GageDepartment of Psychological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Rebecca C RichmondMRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit at the University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-0574-5071
University of Bristol · GBUniversity Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Liverpool · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 19169Cancer Research UK 22171Cancer Research UK C18281/ A19169Cancer Research UK C57854/A22171Medical Research Council 092731Medical Research Council G9815508Medical Research Council MC_PC_15018Medical Research Council MC_PC_19009Medical Research Council MC_UU_00011/5Medical Research Council MC_UU_00011/7Medical Research Council MC_UU_12013/2Medical Research Council MM_UU_00011/5Wellcome Trust 092731Wellcome Trust 102215/2/13/2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biomarkers can be used to assess smoking behaviour more accurately and objectively than self-report. This study assessed the association between cotinine (a biomarker of smoke exposure) and later e-cigarette use among a population who were unexposed to e-cigarettes in youth. Young people in the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children took part in the study. We observed associations between cotinine at 15 years (measured between 2006 and 2008 before the wide availability of e-cigarettes) and self-reported ever use of e-cigarettes at 22 (measured between 2014 and 2015 when e-cigarettes were widely available) using logistic regression. A range of potential confounders were adjusted for (age, sex, body mass index, alcohol use and passive smoke exposure). Additionally, we adjusted for the young people's self-reported smoking status/history to explore potential misreporting and measurement error. In a sample of N = 1,194 young people, cotinine levels consistent with active smoking at 15 years were associated with increased odds of e-cigarette ever use at 22 years (Odds Ratio [OR] = 7.24, 95% CI 3.29 to 15.93) even when self-reported active smoking status at age 16 (OR = 3.14, 95% CI 1.32 to 7.48) and latent classes of smoking behaviour from 14 to 16 (OR = 2.70, 95% CI 0.98 to 7.44) were included in the model. Cotinine levels consistent with smoking in adolescence were strongly associated with increased odds of later e-cigarette use, even after adjusting for reported smoking behaviour at age 16 and smoking transitions from 14 to 16.

Indexed as

Self ReportAdolescentAdultBiomarkersCohort StudiesElectronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleSmokingUnited KingdomYoung AdultBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID32663218
PMCPMC7360042
OpenAlexW3042311591

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.