ReviewCurrent protocols in human genetics2020
Identification and Genotyping of Transposable Element Insertions From Genome Sequencing Data.
Review in Current protocols in human genetics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Long-read DNA and RNA sequencing reveal an intronic retrotransposon insertion in TCOF1 causing Treacher Collins syndrome.HGG advances · 2026Article
- Jumping in the human brain: A review on somatic transposition.Fundamental research · 2026Review
- Multi-platform framework for mapping somatic retrotransposition in human tissues.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- RNA sequencing and target long-read sequencing reveal an intronic transposon insertion causing aberrant splicing.Journal of human genetics · 2024Article
- Contribution and therapeutic implications of retroelement insertions in ataxia telangiectasia.American journal of human genetics · 2023Article
- Analyses of 600+ insect genomes reveal repetitive element dynamics and highlight biodiversity-scale repeat annotation challenges.Genome research · 2023Article
- Taming transposable elements in livestock and poultry: a review of their roles and applications.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2023Review
- Variant calling: Considerations, practices, and developments.Human mutation · 2022Review
- Methodologies for theGenes · 2022Review
- Genomic approaches to trace the history of human brain evolution with an emerging opportunity for transposon profiling of ancient humans.Mobile DNA · 2021Review
- Cas9 targeted enrichment of mobile elements using nanopore sequencing.Nature communications · 2021Article
- Identification of High-Confidence Structural Variants in Domesticated Rainbow Trout Using Whole-Genome Sequencing.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Transposable element (TE) mobilization is a significant source of genomic variation and has been associated with various human diseases. The exponential growth of population-scale whole-genome sequencing and rapid innovations in long-read sequencing technologies provide unprecedented opportunities to study TE insertions and their functional impact in human health and disease. Identifying TE insertions, however, is challenging due to the repetitive nature of the TE sequences. Here, we review computational approaches to detecting and genotyping TE insertions using short- and long-read sequencing and discuss the strengths and weaknesses of different approaches. © 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.