ArticleJAMA network open2020
Estimation of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Risk Among Patients in the Veterans Affairs Health Care System.
Article in JAMA network open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.
- An Evidence Map of the Women Veterans' Health Literature, 2016 to 2023: A Systematic Review.JAMA network open · 2025Pooled it
- Statins, Mortality, and Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events Among US Veterans With Chronic Kidney Disease.JAMA network open · 2023Trial
- The PREVENT Risk Equations and Cardiovascular Prevention in East Asia.Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis · 2026Review
- Initiating Preventive Care for Hyperlipidemia in the Emergency Department: The Emergency Medicine Cardiovascular Risk Assessment for Lipid Disorders Trial.Critical pathways in cardiology · 2025Article
- Performance of the American Heart Association's PREVENT risk score for cardiovascular risk prediction in a multiethnic population.Nature medicine · 2025Article
- Endothelial Activation and Stress Index Predicts All-Cause and Cardiovascular Mortality in Hypertensive Individuals: A Nationwide Study.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2025Article
- Evaluation and Comparison of the PREVENT and Pooled Cohort Equations for 10-Year Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Risk Prediction.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Article
- Lipid-Lowering Therapy Use When Indicated and Subsequent Ischemic Stroke Severity.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Article
- Interplay of rheumatoid arthritis and cardiovascular disease: Insights and prospects.SAGE open medicine · 2025Review
- Initiation of Statins for Primary Prevention in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction.JACC. Advances · 2024Article
- Long-Term Body Mass Index Variability and Adverse Cardiovascular Outcomes.JAMA network open · 2024Article
- Plant-based diets and the incidence of cardiovascular disease: the Million Veteran Program.BMJ nutrition, prevention & health · 2023Article
- Rarely tested or treated but highly prevalent: Hypercholesterolemia in ED observation unit patients with chest pain.The American journal of emergency medicine · 2023Observational
- Comparing the pooled cohort equations and coronary artery calcium scores in a symptomatic mixed Asian cohort.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Article
- Dietary Sodium and Potassium Intake and Risk of Non-Fatal Cardiovascular Diseases: The Million Veteran Program.Nutrients · 2022Article
- Increasing Prevalence and Incidence of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease in Adult Patients in Ontario, Canada From 2002 to 2018.CJC open · 2022Article
- Risk factors and prediction models for incident heart failure with reduced and preserved ejection fraction.ESC heart failure · 2021Article
- Comparative performance of the two pooled cohort equations for predicting atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.Atherosclerosis · 2021Article
- Optimizing Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Risk Estimation for Veterans With Diabetes Mellitus.Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Current guidelines recommend statin therapy for millions of US residents for the primary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). It is unclear whether traditional prediction models that do not account for current widespread statin use are sufficient for risk assessment. Objectives: To examine the performance of the Pooled Cohort Equations (PCE) for 5-year ASCVD risk estimation in a contemporary cohort and to test the hypothesis that inclusion of statin therapy improves model performance. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study included adult patients in the Veterans Affairs health care system without baseline ASCVD. Using national electronic health record data, 3 Cox proportional hazards models were developed to estimate 5-year ASCVD risk, as follows: the variables and published β coefficients from the PCE (model 1), the PCE variables with cohort-derived β coefficients (model 2), and model 2 plus baseline statin use (model 3). Data were collected from January 2002 to December 2012 and analyzed from June 2016 to March 2020. Exposures: Traditional ASCVD risk factors from the PCE plus baseline statin use. Main Outcomes and Measures: Incident ASCVD and ASCVD mortality. Results: Of 1 672 336 patients in the cohort (mean [SD] baseline age 58.0 [13.8] years, 1 575 163 [94.2%] men, 1 383 993 [82.8%] white), 312 155 (18.7%) were receiving statin therapy at baseline. During 5 years of follow-up, 66 605 (4.0%) experienced an ASCVD event, and 31 878 (1.9%) experienced ASCVD death. Compared with the original PCE, the cohort-derived model did not improve model discrimination in any of the 4 age-sex strata but did improve model calibration. The PCE overestimated ASCVD risk compared with the cohort-derived model; 211 237 of 1 136 161 white men (18.6%), 29 634 of 218 463 black men (13.6%), 1741 of 44 399 white women (3.9%), and 836 of 16 034 black women (5.2%) would be potentially eligible for statin therapy under the PCE but not the cohort-derived model. When added to the cohort-derived model, baseline statin therapy was associated with a 7% (95% CI, 5%-9%) lower relative risk of ASCVD and a 25% (95% CI, 23%-28%) lower relative risk for ASCVD death. Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, lower than expected rates of incident ASCVD events in a contemporary national cohort were observed. The PCE overestimated ASCVD risk, and more than 15% of patients would be potentially eligible for statin therapy based on the PCE but not on a cohort-derived model. In the statin era, health care professionals and systems should base ASCVD risk assessment on models calibrated to their patient populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.