ArticleThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene2020
Snakebites in Suriname: Evaluation of the Protocolled Administration of Anti-Snake Venom in a Tertiary Care Setting.
Article in The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Venomous snakebites regularly occur in Suriname, a middle-income country located on the north coast of South America. Officially reported data on incidence and mortality are lacking. The aim of this retrospective study was to assess whether the use of our national snakebite protocol with selective administration of anti-snake venom (ASV) in patients with signs of snakebite envenoming improved clinical outcome as measured by mortality and length of stay (LOS) in the hospital. Medical records of all patients admitted at the Academic Hospital Paramaribo from 2013 to 2015, before and after the introduction of the protocol, with signs of snakebite envenoming, were reviewed for demographics, snakebite characteristics, mortality, length of hospital stay, administration of ASV, and occurrence of complications. Secondary outcome measures were the development of late complications due to a snakebite. Sixty-eight and 76 patients in 2013 and 2015, respectively, with venomous or potentially venomous snakebites were identified. One patient (1.5%) in 2013 and 29 patients (38.2%) in 2015 received ASV. In 2013 one patient died: deterioration of renal function occurred before protocolled ASV administration. No deaths were reported in 2015. There was no difference in the overall length of hospital stay between 2013 and 2015 or in the total number of late complications. In 2015, the mean LOS (±SD) for patients who did not receive ASV (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.