Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32662083›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical psychology2021

Psychometric properties of the Italian version of the Interpersonal Needs Questionnaire-15 (INQ-15-I).

Paolo Iliceto, Laura D'Antuono, Emanuele Fino, Antonino Carcione, Gabriella Candilera, Caroline Silva, Thomas E Joiner

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical psychology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Paolo IlicetoS&P Statistics and Psychometrics Ltd., Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6572-0768
Laura D'AntuonoIndependent Researcher, Bruxelles, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-5354-2557
Emanuele FinoDepartment of Psychology, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5095-6014
Antonino CarcioneThird Centre of Cognitive Psychotherapy, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0176-266X
Gabriella CandileraS&P Statistics and Psychometrics Ltd., Rome, Italy.
Caroline SilvaDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Rochester School of Medicine & Dentistry, Rochester, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7477-1495
Thomas E JoinerDepartment of Psychology, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6798-9085
Florida State University · USLeefmilieu Brussel · BENottingham Trent University · GBUniversity of Rochester · US

Funding

Institutional Career Development CoreKL2TR001999 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI XIAO, JIN · 2016 to 2024
$5.2M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR001999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe Interpersonal Needs Questionnaire (INQ-15) is a self-report measure of thwarted belongingness and perceived burdensomeness, two constructs associated with suicidal ideation. The objective of the current study was to translate the INQ-15 from English to Italian (INQ-15-I) and to test its factor structure, reliability, and validity in Italian samples.

methodWe examined (a) whether the components of the hypothesized two-factor measurement model are invariant across a community sample (N = 510) and a clinical sample (N = 259); (b) the relations between the INQ-15-I factors and measures of depression (Beck Depression Inventory-II), hopelessness (Beck Hopelessness Scale), and suicidal ideation (Beck Scale for Suicide Ideation); (c) the reliability and psychometric properties of the INQ-15-I.

resultsResults from multigroup confirmatory factor analyses supported the adequacy of the two-factor model to represent thwarted belongingness and perceived burdensomeness. The model is invariant across community and clinical groups, showing excellent fit. The two INQ-15-I scales measure highly intercorrelated constructs. Both significantly correlate with depression, hopelessness, and suicidal ideation, and correlations are high in the clinical sample.

conclusionThe INQ-15-I is a valid and reliable measure of thwarted belongingness and perceived burdensomeness. Implications for research, assessment, and intervention in suicidal ideation are discussed.

Indexed as

Interpersonal RelationsSuicidal IdeationHumansItalyPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsRisk FactorsSurveys and QuestionnairesInterpersonal Needs Questionnaire-15 (INQ-15)Interpersonal Theory of SuicideItaliansuicidal ideation

Identifiers

PMID32662083
PMCPMC8944175
OpenAlexW3042323345

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.