Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32661909›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics2020

Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Studies of Elacestrant, A Novel Oral Selective Estrogen Receptor Degrader, in Healthy Post-Menopausal Women.

Maureen G Conlan, Erik F J de Vries, Awjm Glaudemans, Yamei Wang, Steven Troy

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Pharmacokinetic Analysis of [Molecular imaging and biology · 2024
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Pharmacology and pharmacokinetics of elacestrant.Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology · 2023
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Elacestrant: a new FDA-approved SERD for the treatment of breast cancer.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2023
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Maureen G ConlanDepartment of Oncology Clinical Development, Radius Health, Inc., 950 Winter Street, Waltham, MA, 02451, USA. mconlan@radiuspharm.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0298-9866
Erik F J de VriesDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Awjm GlaudemansDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Yamei WangDepartment of Biostatistics, Radius Health, Inc., 950 Winter Street, Waltham, MA, USA.
Steven TroyDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, Radius Health, Inc., 950 Winter Street, Waltham, MA, USA.
Radius Health (United States) · USUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesAdvanced estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancer is currently treated with endocrine therapy. Elacestrant is a novel, nonsteroidal, selective estrogen receptor degrader with complex dose-related ER agonist/antagonist activity that is being developed as a treatment option for ER+ breast cancer.

methodsTwo first-in-human phase 1 studies of elacestrant in healthy postmenopausal women (Study 001/Study 004) were conducted to determine its pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile as well as its safety and maximum tolerated dose.

resultsIn total, 140 postmenopausal subjects received at least one dose of study drug (114 received elacestrant and 26 received placebo). Single-ascending dose and multiple-ascending dose assessments showed that doses up to 1000 mg daily were safe and well tolerated, and the maximum tolerated dose was not reached. Oral administration of elacestrant had an absolute bioavailability of 10% and a mean half-life ranging from 27 to 47 h, reaching steady state after 5-6 days. Mean occupancy of the ER in the uterus after seven daily doses was 83% for 200 mg and 92% for 500 mg daily. The median ratio of elacestrant concentrations in the cerebral spinal fluid vs. plasma was 0.126% (500 mg dose) and 0.205% (200 mg dose). Most adverse events were related to the upper gastrointestinal tract.

conclusionsThese data demonstrate that elacestrant has good bioavailability when administered orally with a half-life that supports once-daily administration. Engagement of the ER and some ability to cross the blood-brain barrier was demonstrated in addition to an acceptable safety profile.

Indexed as

PostmenopauseAdministration, OralAgedBiological AvailabilityCohort StudiesDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleHalf-LifeHumansMaximum Tolerated DoseMiddle AgedSelective Estrogen Receptor ModulatorsTetrahydronaphthaleneselacestrantSelective Estrogen Receptor ModulatorsTetrahydronaphthalenes

Identifiers

PMID32661909
PMCPMC7511284
OpenAlexW3042247738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.